Wellness Beyond Golf – The Fitness Revolution in Clubhouse Design

Episode 112

Welcome back to Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design, the podcast exploring the intricacies of golf clubhouse design, human interaction, and its impact on member lifestyles. I’m your host, and today we’re examining one of the most transformative trends in modern clubhouse design – the evolution from basic fitness rooms to comprehensive wellness destinations that rival the best boutique studios and luxury spas.

For those joining us for the first time, we dive deep into architecture and interior design concepts that lead to successful golf clubhouses and resorts. From pro shops to dining rooms, from locker rooms to, especially relevant today, fitness and wellness facilities, we explore how thoughtful design creates exceptional member experiences. You can find all our episodes at golfclubhousedesign.com and connect with us on LinkedIn.

Today’s episode, “Wellness Beyond Golf: The Fitness Revolution in Clubhouse Design,” explores how clubs are reimagining fitness and wellness to meet the demands of health-conscious members who expect more than a few treadmills in the basement. We’re talking about clubs investing millions in fitness facilities that rival Equinox, recovery amenities that match professional sports teams, and wellness programming that extends far beyond the physical.

This isn’t just about adding square footage or buying expensive equipment. It’s about understanding that for many members, especially younger ones, fitness and wellness are primary drivers of club usage – sometimes even more than golf. We’ll explore how leading clubs are creating facilities that serve everyone from the competitive athlete to the member recovering from surgery, from the yoga enthusiast to the weightlifter, from the marathon runner to the member who just wants to feel better.

Get ready for an in-depth journey through the design considerations, operational challenges, and tremendous opportunities in creating wellness facilities that enhance your club’s value proposition and member satisfaction.

To understand where we’re going, we need to appreciate where we’ve been. For decades, the typical country club fitness facility was an afterthought – a windowless room in the basement with a few pieces of equipment that seemed to have been purchased at a hotel liquidation sale. Maybe there was a single-station multi-gym, a couple of treadmills, and if you were lucky, a set of dumbbells that went up to 40 pounds. The message was clear: fitness wasn’t why you joined a country club.

But something fundamental shifted in the last decade, accelerated dramatically by COVID-19. Fitness and wellness moved from the periphery to the center of many members’ lives. The demographic changes are striking. Younger members joining clubs often use fitness facilities more frequently than they play golf. Women, who represent the fastest-growing segment of club membership, prioritize fitness and wellness amenities in their membership decisions. Even traditional golf-focused members discovered that fitness improved their game and quality of life.

The data tells the story. Clubs with comprehensive fitness facilities report 40-60% of members using them regularly, compared to 20-30% who play golf weekly. The fitness facility might see 500 visits on a day when only 100 rounds of golf are played. This usage intensity has forced clubs to completely rethink their approach to fitness and wellness.

But here’s what’s really revolutionary: it’s not just about exercise anymore. Today’s wellness encompasses physical fitness, mental health, recovery, nutrition, and social connection. Members want a holistic approach to wellness that fits seamlessly into their lifestyle. They’re comparing your facility not to other clubs, but to Life Time, Equinox, Barry’s Bootcamp, and their local boutique studios.

The investment levels reflect this shift. Where clubs once allocated maybe $100,000 for fitness equipment in a renovation, we’re now seeing investments of $2-5 million or more in comprehensive wellness facilities. These aren’t just equipment purchases – they’re architectural transformations that create destinations within the club.

The design implications are profound. We’re talking about prime real estate – not basement corners but spaces with natural light, views, and convenient access. We need infrastructure for heavy equipment loads, sophisticated HVAC for temperature and humidity control, acoustic isolation to prevent noise transfer, and technology integration for connected fitness experiences.

The operational model has evolved too. No longer can clubs rely on an unsupervised room with a liability waiver. Today’s wellness facilities require professional staff, structured programming, and ongoing investment in equipment and education. But the payoff is substantial – wellness facilities are becoming profit centers, not cost centers.

Let me share a specific example that illustrates this transformation. A club in Connecticut recently converted their underutilized tennis facility into a 15,000-square-foot wellness center. The investment was $3.5 million. Within 18 months, they had added 150 new members specifically for the wellness facilities, generating $1.2 million in annual dues plus another $400,000 in personal training and programming revenue. The facility went from being a drain to a driver of club success.

The philosophical shift is equally important. Wellness is no longer separate from golf – it’s complementary. The member who takes a 6 AM spin class might play nine holes after. The foursome might end their round with stretching and recovery. The spouse who doesn’t golf becomes a daily user through fitness. Wellness extends the club’s relevance and usage throughout the year, throughout the day, and throughout the member’s life.

The traditional approach to fitness floor design – rows of cardio equipment facing a mirror, weight machines in another row, free weights in the corner – is completely inadequate for today’s expectations. Modern fitness floor design requires sophisticated space planning that accommodates diverse training styles, different energy levels, and varying expertise.

Let’s start with the fundamental principle: zones, not rows. The most successful fitness facilities create distinct zones for different activities and energy levels. The cardio zone might feature equipment with individual entertainment systems, arranged to maximize views and minimize feeling like you’re on display. The strength training zone needs clear sight lines for safety but also privacy for those intimidated by serious lifters. The functional training zone requires open space with turf, suspension systems, and equipment for dynamic movement.

The equipment selection itself has evolved dramatically. Yes, you still need quality cardio equipment – but now it’s connected treadmills with virtual running programs, bikes that link to Peloton classes, and rowers that compete with other clubs. Strength equipment has moved beyond machines to include Olympic platforms, power racks, and specialized equipment for sport-specific training. Functional fitness tools – battle ropes, sleds, plyometric boxes – require dedicated space and appropriate flooring.

Flooring is a critical design element that’s often underestimated. Different activities require different surfaces. Heavy lifting areas need thick rubber to handle dropped weights. Stretching zones benefit from cushioned flooring. Functional training might require turf. The transitions between these zones need to be seamless and safe. The cost of proper flooring can reach $20-30 per square foot, but it’s essential for safety and longevity.

Technology integration has become mandatory, not optional. Members expect WiFi connectivity for their devices, charging stations for phones and wearables, and screens that can display everything from workout tracking to virtual classes. Some clubs are installing systems that recognize members when they enter, loading their personalized workout plans and tracking their progress automatically. The infrastructure for this technology – power, data, mounting systems – needs to be planned from the beginning.

The acoustic challenge in fitness spaces is immense. You have impact noise from weights, mechanical noise from equipment, and human noise from exertion and instruction. Without proper acoustic treatment, the space becomes unbearable. Solutions include specialized ceiling systems that absorb sound, rubber flooring that reduces impact transmission, and strategic placement of sound-absorbing materials. Some clubs are creating “quiet zones” for members who prefer to exercise without loud music or noise.

Natural light and views transform a fitness experience. Members who can see outside run longer, lift more, and report higher satisfaction. But this creates design challenges – glare on screens, heat gain, and privacy concerns. Solutions include automated shading systems, specialized glass that reduces heat while maintaining views, and careful equipment placement to maximize sightlines while maintaining privacy.

The HVAC requirements for fitness spaces are unlike any other area in the clubhouse. You need high air exchange rates – often 8-12 air changes per hour compared to 4-6 in dining areas. Temperature control is critical but challenging with varying activity levels. Humidity control prevents equipment corrosion and maintains comfort. The best systems provide zone control, allowing different areas to maintain different conditions.

Let me describe a particularly innovative fitness floor design. The club created a central “performance zone” with turf and functional equipment, surrounded by specialized areas – a lifting platform with mirrors and heavy weights on one side, a mind-body studio with natural light on another, cardio equipment with views on the third, and recovery amenities on the fourth. Members naturally flow between zones based on their workout, creating energy and community while maintaining appropriate spacing.

The circulation pattern through the fitness floor matters more than most realize. Members should be able to move between zones without disrupting others. Sight lines should allow staff to monitor all areas from key positions. Emergency exits need to be clear and accessible. Storage for personal items, towels, and small equipment should be distributed throughout, not centralized in one location.

The boutique fitness revolution – think SoulCycle, Barry’s Bootcamp, Pure Barre, F45 – has fundamentally changed member expectations for group fitness. The days of a single aerobics room with a portable sound system are over. Today’s members expect specialized studios with professional lighting, premium sound systems, and programming that rivals standalone boutique studios.

The multi-studio approach has become standard in leading clubs. Rather than one multipurpose room, clubs are creating two, three, or even four specialized studios. The cycling studio with 30 bikes, theatrical lighting, and concert-quality sound. The hot yoga studio with radiant heating, humidity control, and specialized flooring. The high-intensity interval training studio with assault bikes, rowing machines, and battle ropes. Each space is optimized for its specific use rather than compromised for flexibility.

Let’s dive deep into what makes a successful cycling studio, since this has become almost mandatory for competitive clubs. The bikes themselves are just the beginning – you need commercial-grade indoor cycling bikes, often $2,000-3,000 each, with power meters and connectivity. The arrangement matters – stadium-style tiering allows everyone to see the instructor and creates energy. The sound system is crucial – we’re talking about 3,000-5,000 watts of power with multiple zones for even coverage. The lighting system transforms the experience – programmable LED systems that sync with music, creating an immersive environment.

The technology backend for boutique studios is sophisticated. Reservation systems that allow members to book specific bikes. Heart rate monitoring systems that display real-time effort on screens. Leaderboards that create friendly competition. Integration with apps that track performance over time. Some clubs are partnering with companies like Les Mills or Peloton for content, while others are developing proprietary programming.

The mind-body studio presents different challenges. Yoga, Pilates, and barre require precise temperature control – often 75-80 degrees for regular classes, up to 105 for hot yoga. The flooring needs to provide stability for balance poses while offering some cushioning. Natural light is preferred, but with the ability to dim for meditation. Storage for props – mats, blocks, straps, blankets – needs to be accessible but not cluttered.

Acoustic isolation between studios is absolutely critical. The high-energy spin class can’t disturb the meditation session next door. This requires sophisticated construction – isolated slabs, double walls with acoustic insulation, specialized door and window systems. The investment in proper acoustic isolation can add $50-100 per square foot but is essential for simultaneous programming.

The small group training studio is emerging as a key differentiator. This space bridges the gap between personal training and large group classes. Designed for 4-8 participants, it might include suspension training systems, kettlebells, medicine balls, and agility equipment. The intimacy allows for personalized attention while the group dynamic provides motivation and community.

Programming is what brings these studios to life. Successful clubs are offering 50-100 classes per week across their studios. Early morning classes for pre-work members. Lunchtime express sessions. Evening classes for families. Weekend specialty workshops. The variety needs to serve different fitness levels, interests, and schedules.

The instructor quality makes or breaks the boutique studio experience. Members are comparing your instructors to the best in the business. This means competitive compensation, ongoing education, and creating an environment where top talent wants to teach. Some clubs are creating “instructor development programs” to build their bench of talent.

The branding and marketing of boutique studios within the club requires careful thought. Some clubs create sub-brands for their studios – “The Cycle Vault” or “The Power Room” – with their own identity and following. Others integrate everything under the club brand. Either approach can work, but consistency and quality are non-negotiable.

The recovery revolution in fitness has moved from professional sports to mainstream wellness, and club members now expect recovery amenities that go far beyond the traditional sauna. We’re talking about sophisticated spaces dedicated to helping members recover, reduce stress, and optimize their health between workouts.

The cold plunge pool has become the symbol of serious recovery programs. But this isn’t your grandfather’s cold tub – modern cold plunge systems maintain precise temperatures between 39-55 degrees Fahrenheit, with filtration systems that keep water crystal clear, and designs that range from utilitarian to absolutely beautiful. The placement matters too – ideally adjacent to heat therapy options for contrast therapy protocols.

Infrared saunas are supplementing or replacing traditional saunas in many clubs. The appeal is clear – lower ambient temperatures (120-140°F versus 160-200°F), targeted infrared wavelengths that penetrate deeper into tissue, and individual units that provide privacy. The design can be stunning – floor-to-ceiling glass fronts, chromotherapy lighting, integrated sound systems. Some clubs are creating “sauna suites” with multiple units for social distancing and privacy.

The recovery lounge concept is particularly innovative. Imagine a space with zero-gravity chairs equipped with compression therapy boots, PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic field) mats, and meditation headphones. Members can book 30-minute recovery sessions, combining multiple modalities while relaxing in a controlled environment. The investment might be $100,000-200,000, but the member satisfaction and differentiation are substantial.

Cryotherapy chambers, once exclusive to professional sports facilities, are appearing in high-end clubs. While the $150,000-250,000 investment is significant, the appeal to serious athletes and wellness enthusiasts is strong. The key is proper integration – you need space for the unit, a changing area, and supervision protocols. Some clubs are partnering with cryotherapy providers rather than purchasing equipment outright.

The stretching and mobility zone has evolved from a mat in the corner to a dedicated space with specialized equipment. Stretch cages that allow for partner-assisted stretching. Hypervolt percussion devices for self-myofascial release. Foam rollers in various densities. Mirror walls for form checking. Some clubs are adding “stretch therapists” who provide assisted stretching sessions – a service that can generate $100-150 per hour.

Hydrotherapy is making a comeback, but in more sophisticated forms. Contrast pools with precise temperature control. Watsu pools for aquatic therapy. Float tanks for sensory deprivation. The mechanical requirements are substantial – filtration, heating, cooling, and circulation systems that maintain precise conditions. But the member experience is unparalleled.

The design of recovery spaces requires careful attention to atmosphere. These aren’t clinical spaces – they’re sanctuaries. Natural materials like wood and stone create warmth. Lighting is typically dim and indirect, with the ability to adjust for different moods. Sound is carefully controlled – either silence or subtle natural sounds. The goal is to create an environment that promotes parasympathetic nervous system activation.

Integration with the locker room is a crucial design consideration. Members want to flow seamlessly from workout to recovery to shower. This might mean creating a “wet zone” that includes pools, saunas, steam rooms, and showers, with a separate “dry zone” for other recovery modalities. The circulation should be intuitive, with clear sight lines and appropriate privacy.

The operational model for recovery spaces varies. Some clubs include everything in membership. Others charge for premium services like cryotherapy or float tanks. Many find success with a hybrid model – basic recovery amenities included, premium services fee-based. The key is making recovery accessible enough that members develop habits around it.

Technology is entering recovery in interesting ways. Apps that guide members through recovery protocols. Wearables that track recovery metrics and suggest when to push or rest. Virtual reality meditation programs. AI-powered systems that personalize recovery recommendations based on workout data. The clubs embracing this technology are seeing higher engagement and better outcomes.

The explosion of outdoor fitness during COVID revealed something that should have been obvious – exercising outdoors is inherently more enjoyable for many people. The challenge for clubs is creating outdoor fitness spaces that are functional, durable, and aesthetically appropriate for a premium environment.

The outdoor fitness trail or course is becoming a standard amenity. But forget the 1980s parcourse with wooden posts and faded instruction signs. Modern fitness trails integrate seamlessly with the landscape, featuring commercial-grade equipment that weathers beautifully. Stations might include pull-up bars disguised as architectural elements, balance beams that double as landscape features, and plyometric boxes that look like modern sculpture.

The outdoor functional training space is where serious fitness happens al fresco. We’re talking about a dedicated area with turf or specialized outdoor rubber flooring, equipped with everything from battle ropes to sleds. The key is creating a space that feels intentional, not like equipment was just moved outside. This means proper drainage, wind screens, shade structures, and storage solutions that protect equipment while keeping it accessible.

Yoga lawns and meditation gardens serve the mind-body community. The design requirements are subtle but important – level ground with excellent drainage, surrounding landscaping that provides privacy and beauty, and perhaps a pavilion or shade structure for sun protection. Some clubs are adding labyrinths or walking meditation paths, creating contemplative spaces that complement high-energy fitness areas.

The outdoor boot camp phenomenon requires dedicated design consideration. You need open space for running and agility work, stations for strength exercises, and storage for portable equipment. The surface is critical – natural grass looks beautiful but doesn’t hold up to intensive use. Artificial turf provides durability but needs proper drainage and heat management. Some clubs are using hybrid surfaces that combine the best of both worlds.

Pool-based fitness is experiencing a renaissance, moving beyond traditional water aerobics. Aqua cycling, paddleboard yoga, and high-intensity aqua training all require specific pool configurations. Depth, temperature, and lane configuration all matter. Some clubs are adding dedicated fitness pools – smaller, warmer bodies of water optimized for exercise rather than swimming.

The running and walking paths that connect outdoor fitness elements deserve careful design. Width matters – you need room for passing and two-way traffic. Surface selection is critical – crushed granite provides good drainage and joint protection but requires maintenance. Rubberized surfaces offer excellent performance but can be expensive. Lighting extends usability into evening hours. Distance markers and wayfinding help members track their progress.

Weather protection strategies determine how many days per year outdoor spaces can be used. Retractable shade structures provide sun protection without permanent shadows. Misting systems offer cooling in hot climates. Windscreens create microclimates for year-round use. The investment in weather mitigation can double the usable days for outdoor fitness.

As clubs compete for members who have increasingly specific fitness goals, specialized training facilities are becoming key differentiators. These aren’t general fitness spaces – they’re purpose-built environments for specific types of training that command premium fees and create loyal communities within the club.

The golf performance center represents a natural evolution for golf clubs. This goes beyond a hitting bay with a mirror – we’re talking about sophisticated spaces with launch monitors, force plates, 3D motion capture, and specialized equipment for golf-specific fitness. The investment can range from $100,000 for a basic setup to $500,000+ for a comprehensive facility. But the appeal to serious golfers is immense, and the programming opportunities – from junior development to senior flexibility – are endless.

The integration of golf performance with general fitness is where design gets interesting. The space needs to accommodate both high-tech analysis and physical training. This might mean a hitting bay that can transform into a functional training space, or adjacent areas that allow for seamless movement between swing analysis and strength training. The key is creating an environment where golf improvement and physical fitness are seen as inseparable.

The sports performance area serves athletes beyond golf. This might include agility ladders, sprint tracks, vertical jump testing equipment, and sport-specific training tools. The design needs to accommodate explosive movements – reinforced flooring, high ceilings, protective padding where appropriate. Some clubs are partnering with local sports teams or schools, creating revenue opportunities and community connections.

The personal training studio within the larger fitness facility deserves special attention. While some training happens on the main floor, dedicated PT spaces provide privacy for clients who are self-conscious, allow for specialized equipment that might not fit the general population, and create a premium environment that justifies premium pricing. These spaces might include reformer Pilates equipment, specialized rehabilitation tools, or assessment technology like body composition analyzers.

The youth fitness area is increasingly important as clubs focus on family membership. This isn’t just a scaled-down adult gym – it’s a space designed specifically for young bodies and minds. Equipment sized for smaller bodies, programming that makes fitness fun, and design that feels energetic and welcoming to kids while still maintaining club standards. The liability and supervision requirements are significant, but the family loyalty created is invaluable.

The rehabilitation and physical therapy space represents a growing opportunity. Many clubs are partnering with healthcare providers to offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, or sports medicine services. The design requirements are specific – treatment tables, private consultation areas, specialized equipment, and often separate entrances for non-member patients. But the synergy with fitness facilities is obvious, and the revenue potential is substantial.

Virtual training studios are emerging as a hybrid solution. These spaces combine the convenience of digital fitness with the equipment and environment of the club. Members might follow a Peloton class on their own schedule, join a Mirror workout with friends, or participate in virtual personal training with remote coaches. The technology infrastructure is crucial – high-speed internet, large displays, quality sound systems, and user-friendly interfaces.

The assessment and testing lab provides data-driven fitness planning. Body composition analysis, VO2 max testing, movement screens, and metabolic testing all require specialized equipment and controlled environments. While not every member will use these services, they position the club as a serious wellness destination and justify premium membership fees. The data collected can also drive personalized programming and demonstrate progress, increasing member retention.

The modern understanding of wellness extends far beyond exercise to encompass nutrition, stress management, sleep optimization, and lifestyle design. Leading clubs are creating spaces and programs that address these broader wellness dimensions, transforming from fitness centers to true wellness destinations.

The nutrition consultation space has evolved from a desk in the corner to a professional environment where registered dietitians meet with members. This requires private consultation rooms with technology for body composition analysis, meal planning software, and educational materials. Some clubs are adding demonstration kitchens where nutritionists can teach healthy cooking classes, creating an engaging, interactive learning environment.

The juice bar or wellness café has become almost mandatory in premium fitness facilities. But this isn’t just about protein shakes anymore. We’re talking about comprehensive menus with cold-pressed juices, superfood smoothies, acai bowls, and grab-and-go meals that align with various dietary preferences. The design needs to feel integrated with the fitness facility while maintaining food safety standards. Equipment requirements – commercial juicers, blenders, refrigeration – are substantial, often requiring $50,000-100,000 in investment.

The supplement and retail area requires careful planning. Members expect access to quality proteins, vitamins, and recovery products. But this isn’t a GNC – the retail environment needs to match club aesthetics while providing education and guidance. Some clubs are creating “wellness markets” with curated products, local partnerships, and staff expertise that differentiates from online alternatives.

The meditation and mindfulness space addresses mental wellness. This might be a dedicated room with specialized lighting, sound systems for guided meditations, and comfortable seating options. Some clubs are adding float tanks, sensory deprivation experiences, or biofeedback equipment. The key is creating an environment that feels separate from the energy of fitness areas – a true sanctuary within the club.

Sleep optimization is emerging as a wellness focus. While clubs aren’t providing bedrooms, they are offering sleep education, recovery spaces that promote rest, and even nap pods for power naps. Some are partnering with sleep clinics for assessments or offering workshops on sleep hygiene. The design implications include creating truly quiet spaces with controlled lighting and comfortable furniture.

The wellness lounge or library provides education and community. This might include books and magazines on health topics, computers for research and program sign-ups, and comfortable seating for informal consultations or member conversations. It’s a space that reinforces the club’s commitment to comprehensive wellness while providing a lower-energy alternative to fitness areas.

Integration with club dining is crucial but often overlooked. The main dining room’s menu should offer options that align with fitness goals. Pre- and post-workout meals should be available at appropriate times. Special dietary needs – gluten-free, keto, plant-based – should be accommodated without making members feel like special cases. This requires coordination between wellness and culinary teams that goes beyond traditional club operations.

The most beautiful wellness facilities in the world are just expensive rooms without proper programming. The magic happens when spaces are activated with classes, challenges, education, and community-building initiatives that transform individual exercise into collective wellness culture.

The class schedule is the heartbeat of the wellness program. Successful clubs are offering 60-100+ classes per week, ranging from high-intensity interval training to gentle yoga, from cycling to swimming, from boxing to barre. The variety needs to serve different demographics – early morning for workers, mid-morning for retirees, after-school for kids, evenings for families. The logistics of scheduling – instructor availability, space conflicts, member demand – require sophisticated management systems.

Small group training has emerged as a sweet spot between group classes and personal training. Groups of 4-8 members work with a trainer, receiving personalized attention while benefiting from group energy and more affordable pricing. These programs create tight-knit communities within the club – the 6 AM crew, the lunch bunch, the Saturday warriors. The design implication is having spaces that can accommodate these semi-private sessions without disrupting other activities.

Personal training remains the premium offering, but the model is evolving. Beyond one-on-one sessions, trainers are offering partner training, family sessions, and specialized programs for specific goals or conditions. The business model matters – employee trainers versus independent contractors, commission structures, package pricing. Successful clubs are seeing 20-30% of fitness members engage in some form of personal training.

Wellness challenges create energy and engagement. The weight loss challenge, the steps competition, the meditation streak – these programs motivate members while building community. Technology enables sophisticated tracking and gamification. But the design needs to support these programs – display areas for leaderboards, gathering spaces for kick-offs and celebrations, and equipment availability for large groups participating simultaneously.

Educational workshops extend wellness beyond exercise. Nutrition seminars, injury prevention clinics, stress management workshops – these programs position the club as a wellness resource, not just a gym. The space requirements include presentation areas with AV capabilities, demonstration spaces for practical learning, and comfortable seating for longer sessions.

Youth and family programming is crucial for clubs targeting younger demographics. Kids’ fitness classes, family yoga, parent-child training sessions – these programs build multi-generational engagement. But they require specialized spaces, equipment, and instructors trained in youth fitness. The liability and supervision requirements are significant, but the family loyalty created is invaluable.

Senior-specific programming addresses the needs of aging members. Balance classes, arthritis-friendly water aerobics, strength training for bone density – these programs require modifications in equipment, pacing, and instruction style. The design implications include grab bars, non-slip surfaces, and seating options for rest. But the social component is often as important as the physical, with many senior programs becoming tight-knit communities.

Corporate wellness partnerships extend the club’s reach. Local businesses pay for employee memberships or on-site programs, creating revenue and filling off-peak hours. But this requires dedicated resources – corporate accounts management, customized programming, potentially separate entrance or locker facilities. The design might need to accommodate larger groups arriving simultaneously or provide semi-private spaces for corporate classes.

The community-building aspect of wellness programming cannot be overstated. Fitness buddies become friends. Training partners become business connections. Class regulars become social circles. The design should facilitate these connections – social spaces adjacent to fitness areas, comfortable seating for post-workout conversations, and perhaps a wellness café where members naturally gather.

The best wellness facilities can fail with poor operations. Conversely, modest facilities can thrive with excellent staff and systems. Understanding the operational requirements of modern wellness facilities is crucial for both design decisions and long-term success.

The staffing model has evolved far beyond the traditional “gym attendant.” Today’s wellness facilities require fitness directors, personal trainers, group fitness instructors, wellness coaches, massage therapists, nutritionists, and administrative staff. A 10,000-square-foot facility might employ 20-30 people, representing $500,000-1,000,000 in annual payroll. The design needs to support these staff – offices, break rooms, storage for personal items, and professional spaces for consultations.

The fitness director role is crucial and complex. They’re responsible for programming, staff management, member engagement, safety protocols, equipment maintenance, and often P&L management. They need an office with visibility to the fitness floor, technology for program management, and space for staff meetings. The quality of this hire often determines the success of the entire wellness program.

Trainer and instructor quality makes or breaks the member experience. Recruitment is challenging – the best talent has options, and competition from boutique studios and independent training is fierce. Retention requires competitive compensation, continuing education opportunities, and a professional environment. Some clubs are creating “instructor development programs” that build talent pipelines while creating loyalty.

The certification and insurance requirements are significant and growing. Trainers need baseline certifications plus specialized credentials for different populations or modalities. The club needs liability insurance, professional liability coverage for trainers, and potentially medical malpractice insurance if offering certain services. The documentation and verification systems require dedicated administrative resources.

Safety protocols in wellness facilities go beyond general club operations. Equipment inspections, emergency procedures, health screening protocols, cleaning standards – all require systematic approaches and documentation. The design should support safety – clear sight lines for supervision, emergency equipment placement, and communication systems for rapid response.

The member onboarding process sets the tone for engagement. Fitness assessments, goal setting, program design, equipment orientations – these touchpoints require dedicated spaces and staff time. Some clubs are using technology to streamline onboarding, but the human element remains crucial for building confidence and connection.

Hours of operation for wellness facilities often extend beyond general club hours. The 5 AM opening for pre-work exercisers, the 9 PM closing for evening members – these extended hours require staffing models that balance member service with operational costs. Some clubs are experimenting with unstaffed hours using keycard access and remote monitoring, but liability concerns limit this approach.

The maintenance requirements for wellness facilities are intensive. Daily cleaning of equipment and surfaces, weekly deep cleaning of studios, monthly equipment inspections, annual equipment replacement cycles – the operational burden is significant. The design should facilitate maintenance – easy access to equipment for servicing, storage for cleaning supplies, and surfaces that can withstand heavy cleaning.

Technology has transformed every aspect of wellness facilities, from how members book classes to how they track progress. The clubs that thoughtfully integrate technology enhance the member experience while improving operational efficiency. But the key word is “thoughtfully” – technology should enable, not dominate, the wellness experience.

The member app has become the primary interface for wellness engagement. Class reservations, trainer booking, progress tracking, social features – all accessible from a smartphone. The best apps integrate multiple systems – the class schedule, the payment system, the access control, the fitness tracking – into a seamless experience. But this requires significant backend infrastructure and ongoing investment in updates and improvements.

Wearable integration is expected by tech-savvy members. Heart rate monitors that display on studio screens during classes. Fitness trackers that sync with equipment. Apple Watch integration for activity tracking. The club’s technology needs to be agnostic – working with whatever devices members prefer rather than forcing proprietary systems.

Equipment connectivity has evolved from simple LCD displays to sophisticated touchscreens with streaming content, virtual coaching, and social features. But this creates infrastructure demands – reliable WiFi throughout facilities, sufficient bandwidth for multiple simultaneous streams, and support systems for when technology fails. The cost premium for connected equipment is substantial – often 30-50% more than traditional versions.

Virtual and augmented reality are entering wellness facilities. VR meditation experiences, AR-enhanced yoga with form corrections, virtual cycling through scenic routes – these technologies create novel experiences that differentiate clubs. But they require dedicated space, specialized equipment, and staff training. The investment might be $50,000-100,000 for a basic VR wellness setup.

Artificial intelligence is beginning to personalize the wellness experience. AI-powered form analysis for strength training. Chatbots that answer nutrition questions. Predictive analytics that suggest optimal workout times. Machine learning that personalizes class recommendations. These systems require data infrastructure and privacy protocols that many clubs aren’t prepared for.

The data analytics opportunity is immense but underutilized. Modern wellness facilities generate enormous amounts of data – usage patterns, class popularity, member progress, equipment utilization. This data can drive programming decisions, justify equipment purchases, and demonstrate ROI. But it requires systems for collection, analysis, and action that many clubs lack.

Digital content creation has become a competitive necessity. Livestreamed classes for remote participation. On-demand workout libraries for member convenience. Social media content for marketing and engagement. This requires production capabilities – cameras, microphones, lighting, editing software – and staff skills that weren’t traditionally part of club operations.

Let’s talk numbers, because ultimately, wellness facilities need to deliver returns that justify their significant investment. The good news is that well-executed wellness facilities can be tremendous business drivers. The challenge is understanding the full economic model beyond simple revenue and expense.

The capital investment for competitive wellness facilities is substantial. A comprehensive 10,000-15,000 square foot facility might require $3-5 million, including construction, equipment, and technology. That’s $200-400 per square foot, comparable to high-end residential construction. The equipment alone might be $500,000-1,000,000, with replacement cycles of 5-7 years for cardio equipment and 10-15 years for strength equipment.

The operational expenses are ongoing and significant. Staffing, as mentioned, might be $500,000-1,000,000 annually. Utilities for HVAC and lighting add $50,000-100,000. Equipment maintenance and replacement reserves need $50,000-100,000 annually. Supplies, programming, and marketing might add another $100,000. Total annual operating expenses can easily reach $1-2 million for a comprehensive facility.

But the revenue opportunities are equally substantial. Personal training at $75-150 per hour can generate $300,000-600,000 annually with just 5-10 active trainers. Group fitness classes at $20-30 per person with 20 participants average can generate $200,000-400,000. Specialty programs, workshops, and wellness services can add another $100,000-300,000. The total direct revenue might reach $1-1.5 million.

The indirect benefits are where wellness facilities really prove their worth. Member retention improves dramatically – clubs with strong wellness programs see 85-90% retention versus 70-75% without. New member acquisition costs drop when wellness becomes a differentiator. The demographic expansion to younger, more diverse members creates long-term sustainability.

The membership pricing impact is significant. Clubs with comprehensive wellness facilities can command 20-30% premium on dues. For a club with 1,000 members paying $500 monthly, that’s an additional $1.2-1.8 million annually in dues revenue. The wellness facilities might be the difference between a waiting list and vacant memberships.

The real estate value creation is often overlooked. A club with modern wellness facilities might trade at 8-10x EBITDA versus 5-7x without. On a club generating $2 million EBITDA, that’s $6-8 million in additional value. The wellness facilities literally pay for themselves in increased asset value.

The competitive moat created by wellness facilities is crucial in today’s market. It’s relatively easy for a competitor to match your golf course or dining. It’s much harder to replicate a comprehensive wellness program with established communities, trusted instructors, and proven systems. The switching costs for members engaged in wellness programs are high – they won’t leave their workout buddies and favorite instructors for marginally better alternatives.

The wellness industry evolves rapidly, and clubs need to anticipate future trends while avoiding expensive fads. Let’s explore what’s coming next in wellness facility design and programming, based on emerging technologies, demographic shifts, and evolving member expectations.

Longevity and anti-aging are becoming central to wellness positioning. Members aren’t just trying to get fit – they’re trying to extend healthspan and lifespan. This drives demand for sophisticated assessments, biomarker tracking, and interventions beyond traditional fitness. Clubs might add DEXA scanners for body composition, blood testing partnerships, or even hormone optimization programs. The design implications include medical-grade spaces and partnerships with healthcare providers.

Mental health integration is moving from periphery to center. The connection between physical and mental wellness is undeniable, and members expect clubs to address both. This might mean dedicated spaces for therapy or counseling, partnerships with mental health providers, or technology solutions for stress management and emotional wellness. The stigma is decreasing, and the demand is increasing.

Regenerative medicine and advanced recovery are entering mainstream wellness. Peptide therapy, stem cell treatments, hyperbaric oxygen therapy – these interventions are moving from professional sports to private clubs. While regulatory and liability issues are complex, forward-thinking clubs are exploring partnerships with medical providers to offer these services.

The home-club hybrid model is emerging post-COVID. Members want the option to work out at home sometimes, at the club others. This requires digital infrastructure for streaming classes, equipment lending programs, and potentially even home visits from trainers. The club becomes a wellness partner beyond its physical boundaries.

Sustainability in wellness facilities is becoming a member expectation. Energy-efficient equipment, water conservation in pools and showers, non-toxic materials in construction, and local sourcing for wellness cafes. The WELL Building Standard, specifically designed for wellness facilities, is gaining traction. Members, especially younger ones, expect environmental responsibility alongside personal wellness.

The social wellness component is gaining recognition. Loneliness and isolation are health crises, and clubs are uniquely positioned to address them. Design implications include more social spaces within wellness facilities, programming that encourages connection, and technology that facilitates member interaction. The workout partner might become as important as the workout itself.

Precision wellness using genomics and AI will personalize every aspect of the experience. Genetic testing that informs exercise selection. Microbiome analysis that drives nutrition recommendations. AI that predicts injury risk and adjusts programming accordingly. While this sounds futuristic, early versions are already appearing in premium facilities.

As we conclude this deep dive into wellness facility design, let’s distill the key insights for clubs considering investment in fitness and wellness.

First, half-measures don’t work in wellness. Members compare your facilities to the best they’ve experienced, not to other clubs. If you’re going to invest in wellness, commit to doing it right. A mediocre fitness facility is worse than none at all – it sends the message that wellness isn’t really important to your club.

Second, wellness is not separate from your club’s core identity – it’s an enhancement of it. The golf club that adds wellness becomes a lifestyle destination. The city club that adds fitness becomes a daily touchpoint. The family club that adds comprehensive wellness serves multiple generations. Don’t think of wellness as a department – think of it as a philosophy that permeates everything.

Third, the operational commitment is as important as the capital investment. Beautiful facilities with poor programming and staff will fail. Modest facilities with excellent people and programs will thrive. Budget for ongoing operational excellence, not just opening day ribbon-cutting.

Fourth, measure everything and be patient with returns. Wellness facilities take time to build community and habits. The member who joins for golf might take a year to try fitness. But once they’re engaged, they become your most loyal advocates. Track usage, satisfaction, and financial metrics religiously, but give programs time to mature.

Fifth, design for evolution, not revolution. The wellness industry changes rapidly. Your facilities need to accommodate new equipment, programs, and technologies without major reconstruction. Build in flexibility from day one – extra power capacity, reinforced structures, adaptable spaces.

Finally, remember that wellness is ultimately about human flourishing. Yes, the business model needs to work. Yes, the facilities need to be competitive. But at its core, a great wellness facility helps members live better lives. When you get that right, everything else follows.

The clubs that embrace comprehensive wellness aren’t just adding amenities – they’re transforming their value proposition. They’re becoming essential partners in their members’ health journey. They’re creating communities centered on vitality and longevity. And they’re building sustainable business models for an uncertain future.

Thank you for joining me for this comprehensive exploration of wellness facility design. The fitness revolution in clubhouses is really a wellness revolution in how we think about clubs themselves. If your club is planning wellness facilities or struggling with existing ones, I’d love to hear your experiences.

Connect with us at golfclubhousedesign.com or on LinkedIn to continue the conversation. Share your wellness success stories, your challenges, and your questions. The collective wisdom of our industry will shape the next generation of club wellness facilities.

Until next time, remember that great wellness design isn’t just about equipment and square footage – it’s about creating environments where members can become their best selves, where community flourishes around shared goals, and where the pursuit of wellness becomes a joyful part of daily life. This has been Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design. Keep innovating, keep building communities of wellness, and keep designing spaces that transform lives, one workout at a time.

 

The Renovation Revelation – What We Learned from Post-COVID Clubhouse Transformations

Episode 111

Welcome back to Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design, the podcast exploring the intricacies of golf clubhouse design, human interaction, and its impact on member lifestyles. I’m your host, and today we’re conducting a fascinating autopsy – not of failure, but of one of the most intense periods of innovation and experimentation in club history.

For those new to our show, we dive deep into architecture and interior design concepts that lead to successful golf clubhouses and resorts. From dining spaces to locker rooms, from pro shops to fitness facilities, we explore how thoughtful design creates exceptional member experiences. You can find all our episodes at golfclubhousedesign.com and connect with us on LinkedIn.

Today’s episode, “The Renovation Revelation: What We Learned from Post-COVID Clubhouse Transformations,” examines the unprecedented wave of changes clubs made during and after the pandemic. Some of these changes were panic-driven responses to immediate needs. Others were acceleration of long-planned improvements. Some were brilliant innovations that will define clubs for decades. Others were expensive mistakes we’re now quietly removing.

With nearly five years of perspective, we can now honestly evaluate what worked, what didn’t, and most importantly, what these experiments taught us about the future of clubhouse design. We’ll explore the outdoor dining spaces that went from temporary tents to permanent architecture, the technology that members embraced versus what they rejected, and yes, we’ll talk about those plexiglass dividers and one-way corridors that seemed so important at the time.

This isn’t just a historical review – it’s a masterclass in adaptation, innovation, and the importance of understanding what members really value versus what we think they want. Let’s dive into the lessons learned from the most disruptive period in modern club history.

March 2020. Clubs worldwide faced an existential crisis. Overnight, the fundamental premise of a private club – bringing people together in shared spaces – became impossible. What followed was the fastest period of innovation in club history, driven not by choice but by necessity.

The immediate response was purely reactive. Plexiglass barriers went up everywhere. Furniture was removed to create distance. One-way circulation paths were marked with tape. QR codes replaced physical menus. These weren’t design decisions – they were survival tactics. But something interesting happened: some of these emergency measures revealed opportunities we’d never considered.

Take outdoor dining. Pre-pandemic, most clubs had a patio or terrace, often underutilized except for perfect weather days. Suddenly, outdoor dining wasn’t an amenity – it was the only option. Clubs erected tents, installed heaters, brought in temporary furniture. The investment was supposed to be temporary, just to get through the crisis.

But members loved it. Not just tolerated – loved. They discovered that dining outdoors, even in less-than-perfect weather, had an energy and appeal that the formal dining room lacked. The casual atmosphere, the connection to the golf course, the fresh air – these weren’t compromises, they were improvements.

The technology adoption was equally revealing. Clubs that had resisted online reservations for decades implemented them in days. Mobile ordering, contactless payment, digital communications – changes that typically would have taken years of committee debates happened instantly. And while some members grumbled, most adapted quickly and then wondered why we hadn’t done this sooner.

Flexible spaces suddenly proved their worth. That ballroom that could be divided? It became three separate dining rooms with independent ventilation. The boardroom with operable walls? It transformed into a private dining suite for families uncomfortable with public spaces. Clubs with flexible infrastructure adapted quickly; those with fixed, single-purpose spaces struggled.

But here’s what’s really interesting about this forced innovation: it broke the sacred cows of club tradition. The dining room that “had to” have white tablecloths? Members were fine with bare wood tables that could be easily sanitized. The formal service style that defined the club? Members embraced casual, efficient service that minimized contact. The dress code that was non-negotiable? It quietly relaxed and nobody complained.

This period taught us that many of our “unchangeable” traditions were actually just habits. When forced to choose between tradition and operation, clubs chose operation – and members largely supported these choices. The question became: which changes were crisis responses to abandon, and which were improvements to preserve?

The financial pressure added another dimension. Clubs needed to generate revenue any way possible. Takeout programs, meal kits, virtual events, outdoor fitness classes – clubs tried everything. Some initiatives failed spectacularly. Others revealed entirely new revenue streams. The experimentation was messy but invaluable.

Of all the pandemic-era changes, none has had more lasting impact than the transformation of outdoor dining from afterthought to centerpiece. What started as tents and temporary furniture has evolved into sophisticated outdoor dining architecture that’s reshaping how clubs allocate capital and design resources.

Let’s trace this evolution. Phase one was pure emergency response – pop-up tents, portable heaters, folding tables. The goal was simply to create legal dining space. Aesthetics were secondary to survival. But something unexpected happened: members didn’t just tolerate these temporary solutions, they embraced them. The energy, the casual atmosphere, the connection to the landscape – it all worked.

Phase two began when clubs realized this wasn’t temporary. Those emergency tents started getting upgrades. Flooring systems to eliminate mud and create level surfaces. Lighting packages that extended usability into evening. Heating and cooling systems that made spaces comfortable year-round. The temporary was becoming permanent, but still with a temporary mindset.

Phase three – where leading clubs are now – involves purpose-built outdoor dining architecture. We’re talking about sophisticated structures that cost hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. Retractable roof systems that provide weather protection while maintaining the outdoor feel. Glass wall systems that can fully open or close based on conditions. Integrated heating and cooling that makes these spaces comfortable in any weather.

The design requirements for permanent outdoor dining are complex. You need infrastructure – electrical, plumbing, gas for heating and cooking. You need weather resistance without sacrificing aesthetics. You need flexibility to accommodate different group sizes and event types. You need durability to withstand constant use and weather exposure. And you need it all to feel special, not like you’re eating in a tent.

Material selection has been fascinating to watch evolve. Early solutions used whatever was available – plastic furniture, vinyl coverings, temporary flooring. Now we’re seeing outdoor furniture that rivals indoor quality – teak and aluminum pieces with performance fabrics, natural stone flooring with heating systems underneath, architectural fabric structures that provide shade while maintaining views.

The kitchen connection challenge has driven innovation. How do you efficiently serve an outdoor dining area that might be 200 feet from the main kitchen? Solutions include satellite kitchens with finishing capabilities, sophisticated hot/cold holding systems, and covered service corridors that maintain food quality during transport. Some clubs have added outdoor cooking stations – wood-fired pizza ovens, grills, raw bars – that become part of the dining theater.

The year-round usability quest has pushed the boundaries of outdoor comfort. Infrared heating systems that warm people, not air. Misting systems for cooling that don’t create uncomfortable dampness. Fire features that provide both warmth and ambiance. Retractable screens that block wind without obstructing views. The goal is to extend the outdoor dining season from 3-4 months to 10-12 months.

But here’s the really significant shift: outdoor dining has become preferred, not just acceptable. Members are requesting outdoor tables even when indoor is available. Private events are choosing outdoor spaces over traditional ballrooms. The revenue per square foot of well-designed outdoor dining often exceeds indoor space.

The operational benefits have been surprising too. Outdoor spaces are easier to clean and maintain. The casual atmosphere allows for more flexible service styles. Noise is less of an issue. Groups with children are more comfortable. The list goes on.

The investment required for quality outdoor dining is substantial – often $500-1000 per square foot for fully built-out spaces. But the ROI has been impressive. Increased covers, higher member satisfaction, new event opportunities, and extended operating seasons all contribute to payback periods of 3-5 years in many cases.

The pandemic forced a massive technology experiment across clubs. Some innovations became indispensable; others are gathering dust. Understanding why certain technologies stuck while others failed provides crucial lessons for future investment.

Let’s start with the winners – technologies that members embraced and won’t give up. Online reservation systems top the list. The ability to book tee times, dining reservations, and fitness classes from your phone is now non-negotiable. Clubs that try to revert to call-only reservations face member revolt. The convenience, transparency, and control these systems provide have become expected baseline service.

Mobile ordering and payment succeeded beyond expectations. The initial driver was contactless service, but the benefits went far beyond safety. Members love ordering drinks from the course and having them ready at the turn. Parents appreciate ordering kids’ meals from the pool without leaving their chairs. The operational efficiency of digital orders – no transcription errors, automatic kitchen routing, integrated payment – has made this technology sticky for both members and staff.

QR code menus seemed like a temporary solution, but they’ve evolved into something more sophisticated. Dynamic menus that update in real-time, wine lists with detailed information, daily specials that don’t require printing – the flexibility has proved valuable. Smart clubs offer both digital and physical menus, letting members choose their preference.

Communication platforms that actually work have been game-changers. Push notifications for course conditions, event reminders, and reservation confirmations. Two-way messaging with staff. Community forums for member interaction. The clubs that integrated these tools into a seamless experience have seen engagement soar.

Virtual fitness and instruction found a permanent place. Not as replacement for in-person, but as supplement. Early morning yoga classes that members can join from home. Swing analysis that happens asynchronously. Nutrition coaching via video. These services extend the club’s value beyond its physical boundaries.

But now let’s talk about the failures – the technology investments that didn’t stick. Temperature screening kiosks and health check apps were abandoned as soon as regulations allowed. The friction they created outweighed any perceived benefit, and members resented the intrusion.

Robot delivery systems and automated service solutions largely failed in the club environment. While they might work in hotels or airports, club members value human interaction and personal service. The novelty wore off quickly, and the impersonal nature contradicted club culture.

Virtual event platforms had mixed results. While some educational content and speaker events work virtually, attempts to recreate social events online fell flat. Virtual wine tastings, online galas, and Zoom cocktail parties reminded everyone that technology can’t replace in-person connection.

Overly complex health and safety apps failed due to user friction. Multi-step check-in processes, complicated health attestations, and byzantine reservation systems frustrated members more than they helped. The lesson: convenience trumps complexity every time.

The surprise success story has been hybrid technology – systems that enhance rather than replace human interaction. The sommelier who uses an iPad to show wine regions while describing selections. The golf pro who combines in-person lessons with video analysis apps. The chef who livestreams cooking demonstrations from the actual club kitchen. These technologies amplify expertise rather than replacing it.

Investment levels varied wildly. Some clubs spent hundreds of thousands on technology that was abandoned within months. Others achieved digital transformation with relatively modest investments in the right tools. The difference? Clubs that succeeded focused on member experience rather than technology for technology’s sake.

The integration challenge remains real. The average club now has 15-20 different technology systems – reservations, point of sale, communications, fitness, golf, events, accounting. When these systems don’t talk to each other, the member experience suffers. The clubs winning the technology game have either invested in integration or chosen comprehensive platforms that work together.

The pandemic validated what flexible design advocates had been preaching for years – spaces that can adapt to different uses provide resilience and value far beyond their additional cost. Let’s examine which flexible design strategies proved their worth and which were just theoretical benefits.

The MVP of flexibility was the divisible ballroom. Clubs with operable walls could create multiple smaller dining rooms when large gatherings were prohibited. They could adjust room sizes based on comfort levels. They could host simultaneous events with appropriate separation. The clubs with fixed ballrooms struggled to generate event revenue during restrictions and even now find themselves with spaces too large for many modern events.

Furniture mobility became crucial. Clubs that had invested in quality furniture on casters, modular seating systems, and lightweight but sturdy tables could reconfigure spaces daily or even multiple times per day. Morning yoga became lunch dining became afternoon conference became evening cocktails. The same space generated revenue all day long instead of sitting empty between scheduled uses.

Outdoor-indoor flexibility proved invaluable. Clubs with large opening wall systems could create hybrid spaces – technically outdoor for regulations but feeling indoor for comfort. Retractable roof systems, moveable glass walls, and convertible spaces allowed clubs to adapt to changing rules and member preferences. The investment in these systems – often $100,000+ – paid for itself through continued operation when fixed spaces couldn’t be used.

The surprising flexibility winner was storage. Clubs with adequate, accessible storage could quickly transform spaces. Extra furniture could be removed or added. Partition walls could be deployed or stored. Equipment for different activities could be rotated. The clubs that had skimped on storage found themselves with furniture in hallways and equipment cluttering spaces.

Multi-purpose programming spaces emerged as essential. That room that was “just” for cards became a conference room, a private dining room, a fitness studio, and a children’s activity space – sometimes all in the same day. The key was infrastructure – appropriate flooring, adequate ventilation, technology connections, and acoustic treatment that worked for various uses.

Kitchen flexibility separated the successful from the struggling. Clubs with equipment on wheels, multiple cooking zones, and adaptable prep areas could handle everything from takeout programs to outdoor dining to traditional service. Those with fixed, single-purpose kitchen layouts couldn’t adapt to new service models.

But not all flexibility proved valuable. Over-complicated mechanical systems that promised infinite adjustability often failed or were too complex for staff to operate. Moveable walls that required specialists to reconfigure weren’t practical for daily changes. Ultra-flexible furniture that compromised comfort or durability wasn’t worth the trade-off.

The cost of flexibility varies widely. Basic furniture on casters might add 10-15% to furniture costs. Operable walls can add $50,000-150,000 to a room. Retractable roof systems can cost $500,000 or more. But the payback comes through increased utilization, continued operation during restrictions, and ability to accommodate diverse needs.

The pandemic transformed health from a nice-to-have amenity to a core member value. But which health and wellness additions have staying power, and which were just crisis responses? The answers reveal changing member priorities that will shape clubs for years to come.

Air quality improvements topped the list of lasting changes. HEPA filtration, UV sanitization, and increased fresh air circulation weren’t just for COVID – members discovered they appreciated fewer colds, reduced allergies, and generally fresher-feeling spaces. Clubs report that the $50,000-200,000 invested in air quality improvements continues to pay dividends in member satisfaction and reduced sick days for staff.

Touchless everything has largely remained. Automatic doors, touchless faucets, and sensor-activated dispensers were initially about disease prevention but proved to be operational improvements. They’re more hygienic, reduce maintenance, and feel more premium. The member expectation for touchless interaction in restrooms, entries, and service areas has become permanent.

Outdoor fitness spaces exploded during the pandemic and haven’t contracted. That parking lot turned yoga studio, that lawn converted to bootcamp space, that cart path used for running groups – these “temporary” solutions revealed demand for outdoor exercise options. Many clubs have now created permanent outdoor fitness facilities with proper flooring, equipment storage, and shade structures.

The wellness room concept has evolved and stuck. Initially created for temperature checks or health screening, these spaces have transformed into meditation rooms, stretching studios, or recovery lounges. The small, private space for decompression and personal wellness has found a permanent place in the club ecosystem.

Cleaning theater has partially remained. The visible, frequent cleaning that reassured members during the pandemic has been scaled back but not eliminated. Members still appreciate seeing regular cleaning, even if they no longer need the every-30-minutes sanitization. The key is visible maintenance of cleanliness standards without the performative excess.

Personal space expectations have permanently shifted. Members now expect more room between tables, less crowded locker rooms, and more spacious fitness equipment placement. The sardine-packed dining room and equipment-crammed fitness center feel wrong now. This has reduced capacity but improved experience – and members are willing to pay for the space.

Mental health and stress reduction amenities have grown from the pandemic focus on wellness. Quiet zones, meditation spaces, and stress-reduction programs that started during lockdown have expanded. Clubs are adding dedicated wellness practitioners, mindfulness programs, and spaces designed for mental health support.

But some health additions haven’t lasted. The sanitization stations every 50 feet have been reduced to strategic locations only. The constant fogging and deep-cleaning protocols have returned to normal maintenance schedules. The health questionnaires and screening procedures disappeared as soon as allowed.

The nutrition focus that emerged during the pandemic has had mixed results. Healthy menu options, immunity-boosting ingredients, and wellness-focused dining have remained popular with some segments. But the comfort food desire has also remained strong. Successful clubs offer both without judgment.

The investment in health and wellness has been substantial but targeted. Air quality improvements: $50,000-200,000. Outdoor fitness spaces: $25,000-100,000. Touchless upgrades: $20,000-50,000. Wellness rooms: $10,000-30,000. The total health and wellness investment for many clubs reached $200,000-500,000, with most reporting positive ROI through member retention and recruitment.

The operational impact of health focus has been significant. Staff training on cleanliness standards, investment in cleaning equipment and supplies, and ongoing member communication about health protocols all require resources. But clubs report that the elevated cleanliness standards have reduced liability issues and improved overall member satisfaction.

Not every pandemic-era renovation succeeded. Some expensive experiments failed spectacularly, providing valuable lessons about member preferences and operational realities. Let’s honestly examine what didn’t work and analyze the real return on investment from this unprecedented period of change.

The biggest failure category was over-automation. Clubs that invested heavily in reducing human interaction found members actually missed the personal touch. Automated check-in kiosks, robot servers, and app-only service models were largely rejected. Members chose clubs specifically for human connection and personal service – automating that away was solving the wrong problem.

Single-purpose COVID solutions proved wasteful. Those expensive plexiglass dividers? Most are in storage or landfills. The one-way circulation paths that required extensive wayfinding? Removed as soon as possible. The isolation dining pods? Gathering dust. Anything designed solely for pandemic response without broader utility was money poorly spent.

Over-building outdoor space was another common mistake. Some clubs added so much outdoor capacity that they can’t fill it even on perfect days. Multiple outdoor bars, excessive patio space, and redundant outdoor kitchens now sit underutilized. The lesson: incremental expansion based on actual demand beats speculative overbuilding.

Technology platform proliferation created its own problems. Clubs that said yes to every vendor offering a COVID solution now have a confusing maze of apps, systems, and platforms that don’t integrate. Members need different logins for reservations, dining, fitness, and communications. The complexity has actually reduced engagement for many clubs.

The virtual membership category largely failed. The idea that members would pay significant fees for purely digital access to club services didn’t materialize. Virtual fitness classes, online wine tastings, and digital golf instruction work as supplements but not replacements for physical membership.

Now let’s talk real ROI numbers. The clubs that focused on flexible, multi-use improvements are seeing strong returns. Outdoor dining spaces averaging 25-35% ROI annually through increased covers and event revenue. Technology investments in core systems (reservations, communications, payment) showing 20-30% operational cost savings. Air quality improvements are harder to quantify but show up in member satisfaction scores and retention rates.

The total investment varied wildly by club. Conservative clubs spent $200,000-500,000 on essential upgrades. Aggressive clubs invested $2-5 million in comprehensive transformations. The sweet spot seems to be $750,000-1.5 million for meaningful improvements without overextension.

The payback periods are becoming clear. Outdoor dining: 3-5 years. Core technology systems: 2-3 years. Flexibility upgrades: 4-6 years. Health and wellness additions: 3-7 years depending on scope. Single-purpose COVID solutions: never.

The member assessment tolerance has been surprising. Many clubs successfully passed special assessments for COVID improvements – $1,000-5,000 per member was common. Members understood the need and supported clubs through the crisis. However, that tolerance is waning as clubs return to normal operations.

As we conclude our examination of post-COVID clubhouse transformations, the overarching lesson is clear: crisis accelerated evolution that was already overdue. The pandemic didn’t create new member needs – it revealed and amplified existing ones.

The successful renovations shared common characteristics. They solved multiple problems, not just COVID response. They enhanced rather than replaced human interaction. They provided flexibility for unknown future needs. They aligned with long-term member demographic trends. And critically, they improved the member experience in ways that transcend the pandemic.

For clubs planning future renovations, the lessons are invaluable. First, invest in flexibility over fixed solutions. The next disruption might not be a pandemic, but something will challenge our operating models again. Second, don’t underestimate the power of outdoor spaces. The connection to nature and fresh air has proven to be more than a trend. Third, technology should enable service, not replace it. Members want efficiency AND personal attention.

The financial discipline learned during this period should persist. Clubs discovered they could make decisions quickly when necessary. They learned to pilot before fully committing. They found creative funding solutions. This agility and fiscal creativity shouldn’t disappear with the crisis.

The member expectation reset is permanent. Standards for cleanliness, technology integration, and flexibility have been raised. Clubs can’t return to 2019 operations and expect member satisfaction. The new baseline includes online reservations, outdoor dining options, enhanced wellness amenities, and flexible spaces.

Looking forward, the clubs that will thrive are those that learned the right lessons. Not that we need plexiglass dividers, but that we need adaptable spaces. Not that we need robot servers, but that we need efficient service. Not that we need isolation, but that we need options for how members engage.

The innovation muscle developed during the pandemic shouldn’t atrophy. Clubs proved they could change quickly when necessary. That capability – to experiment, adapt, and evolve – might be the most valuable outcome from this challenging period.

The ultimate revelation from these renovations is that clubs are more resilient and adaptable than we imagined. When faced with existential threat, they innovated. When forced to change, they evolved. When challenged to serve members in new ways, they succeeded. This resilience, more than any physical renovation, might be the lasting legacy of the pandemic era.

Thank you for joining me for this deep dive into post-COVID clubhouse transformations. The lessons learned during this period will shape club design for decades to come. If your club went through significant renovations during this period, I’d love to hear what worked and what didn’t. Connect with us at golfclubhousedesign.com or on LinkedIn to share your experiences.

Until next time, remember that great design isn’t just about solving today’s problems – it’s about creating flexibility for tomorrow’s challenges. The pandemic taught us that the future is unpredictable, but good design can provide resilience whatever comes next. This has been Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design. Keep innovating, keep adapting, and keep creating spaces that serve members excellently in any circumstances.

The Private Equity Wave in Architecture – What the KDC-ClubWorks Deal Tells Us

Episode 110

Show Notes

Welcome back to Experience in Clubhouse Design, the podcast where we explore the evolving world of private club architecture, design trends, and the business forces shaping the industry. Today we’re diving deep into a seismic shift happening right now in the architecture world—one that’s particularly relevant to those of us in the club and hospitality space.

In August 2025, Kuo Diedrich Chi Architects, better known as KDC, announced they were joining ClubWorks as a partner firm. For those unfamiliar, KDC is an absolute powerhouse in our industry. They’ve been the creative force behind multiple winners in Golf Inc.’s Amenity of the Year, Golden Fork, and Clubhouse of the Year competitions. They aren’t just award-winners; they’re the firms shaping how members experience luxury, community, and hospitality.

But here’s what makes this announcement significant: it’s not just another merger. It’s part of a much larger trend—private equity and private capital rolling up professional services firms, including architecture practices. And this trend is accelerating fast.

Today, we’re going to unpack what this means for the industry, for design quality, for innovation, and ultimately, for the clubs and resorts that we all care about.

Let’s start with the basics. What exactly happened here?

Kuo Diedrich Chi Architects was formed in 2017 through a merger of two established firms, Kuo Diedrich and Chi Design Group. They’ve built a stellar reputation in the club and hospitality space. Now, they’ve joined ClubWorks, which describes itself as a network of wholly owned firms providing professional services in the private club, real estate, and hospitality industries.

Here’s what’s interesting about ClubWorks. it’s not just buying up architecture firms randomly. They’ve created what you might call a one-stop-shop for private clubs. Their portfolio now includes:

  • Peacock + Lewis Architects and Planners
  • JBD JGA Design and Architecture
  • Visionary Spectacle Studios (architectural visualization)
  • GGA Partners (consulting)
  • Private Club Films (video production)
  • ClubWorks Engineering
  • Buffalo Groupe (marketing)
  • And now, KDC

Do you see the pattern? They’re assembling an integrated service platform. If you’re a club looking to do a major renovation or build a new facility, ClubWorks can theoretically handle everything from initial consulting to architecture, interior design, engineering, marketing videos, and even helping you communicate with your membership.

Michael Leemhuis, Chairman and CEO of ClubWorks, said something telling in the announcement: “Their influence is respected globally across the club industry, and we’re proud to welcome them into ClubWorks as we continue shaping the future of experiential environments.”

Notice that phrase “shaping the future.” That’s the language of consolidation and transformation.

Now, let’s zoom out. What KDC and ClubWorks represent is just one data point in a much larger phenomenon. Private equity has discovered professional services firms, and they’re pouring money into the sector at an unprecedented rate.

The numbers are staggering. The private equity market in the United States alone was expected to reach $460 billion in 2024, with projections to hit $765 billion by 2027 representing an 11% compound annual growth rate. After a two-year slowdown, deal activity rebounded strongly in 2024, with global private equity deal volume increasing 22%, from $1.3 trillion in 2023 to $1.7 trillion in 2024.

But here’s what’s really interesting: professional services firms have become a particular favorite. We’re seeing massive investments in accounting firms, consulting practices, wealth management companies and yes, architecture firms.

Why? Three reasons keep coming up:

First: Recurring Revenue. These firms have predictable cash flows. Clubs need ongoing design work. Restaurants need renovations. Resorts have continuous development projects. For private equity, that predictability is gold.

Second: Fragmentation. The architecture industry, particularly in specialized niches like club and hospitality design, is highly fragmented. There are dozens of small to mid-sized firms. Private equity loves fragmentation because it creates consolidation opportunities. They can build what’s called a “platform” company like ClubWorks and then execute a “buy-and-build” strategy, acquiring smaller firms and integrating them into a larger network.

Third: Scalability with Technology. Modern architecture practices can leverage technology in ways that weren’t possible a decade ago. AI-assisted design, virtual reality walkthroughs, cloud-based collaboration tools, advanced rendering software all of this means firms can do more with less, or serve more clients without proportionally increasing headcount. Private equity sees this as a value creation opportunity.

According to multiple industry reports, add-on acquisitions in professional services which includes architecture have become a primary driver of private equity deal activity. In some segments, add-on deals represented nearly 80% of all transactions. These aren’t massive, headline-grabbing buyouts. They’re strategic additions to existing platforms, building scale and service capabilities.

So let’s talk about the upside. What are the potential advantages of private equity involvement in architecture, particularly in our niche of club and hospitality design?

Advantage 1: Capital for Investment

Architecture firms traditionally operate on relatively thin margins. They’re partnership models where profits get distributed annually. This structure doesn’t encourage major capital investments. But clubs and resorts are demanding increasingly sophisticated services virtual reality presentations, sustainability consulting, smart building integration, wellness design expertise.

Private equity brings capital that can fund these investments. A firm backed by PE can afford to hire specialists in emerging areas, invest in cutting-edge software, or even fund research and development into new design methodologies.

Howard Kuo, principal of KDC, hinted at this when he said their partnership with ClubWorks would allow them to “scale creativity, push boundaries and deliver even more impactful solutions for our golf club and hospitality clients and partners around the world.”

Advantage 2: Integrated Service Delivery

Think about the typical club renovation from a General Manager’s perspective. You hire a consultant to assess needs. Then you hire an architect. Then a separate interior designer. Then engineers. Then someone to do renderings. Then a marketing firm to help communicate the project to your membership. Every handoff is a potential point of friction, miscommunication, or delay.

What ClubWorks is building and what similar platforms aim to achieve is eliminating those handoffs. One relationship, one accountability structure, theoretically better coordination.

For club leaders, this could mean faster projects, fewer surprises, and more predictable outcomes.

Advantage 3: Operational Excellence

Private equity firms bring sophisticated operational frameworks. They have playbooks for improving financial management, optimizing pricing strategies, standardizing quality control, and developing talent. Many smaller architecture firms are run by brilliant designers who, let’s be honest, may not be equally brilliant at business management.

PE-backed firms can implement systems that improve efficiency without compromising design quality. Better project management software. Standardized contract templates. More disciplined budgeting and scheduling. These aren’t sexy topics, but they make a real difference in client experience.

Advantage 4: Geographic and Service Expansion

With PE backing, firms can more easily expand into new markets or add complementary services. A firm known for clubhouses might add restaurant design. A firm strong in golf facilities might expand into wellness centers or residential hospitality. This breadth can benefit clients looking for consistent design language across multiple project types.

Now, let’s address the elephant in the room. Because for every advantage, there’s a legitimate concern. And frankly, some of these concerns are significant.

Concern 1: The Partnership Model vs. The Corporate Model

Architecture, particularly at the high end, has traditionally operated on a partnership model. Senior designers have ownership stakes. They’re not just employees; they’re literally partners. This structure aligns incentives—when a project succeeds and a client is thrilled, the partners benefit directly.

Private equity changes this fundamentally. Partners become employees, or at best, minority shareholders. The primary accountability shifts from clients and creative excellence to investors and financial returns.

Will this change the culture? Almost certainly. The question is whether it changes it for better or worse.

Concern 2: The Pressure for Growth and Returns

Private equity firms typically hold investments for 5-7 years. During that period, they need to demonstrate significant value creation to achieve returns that satisfy their limited partners the pension funds, endowments, and family offices that invest in PE funds.

This creates pressure for growth. Rapid growth. Which often means more projects, more clients, more revenue. But architecture isn’t manufacturing widgets. Quality design requires time, iteration, deep client relationships, and sometimes, saying no to projects that aren’t the right fit.

Will PE-backed firms start taking on too many projects? Will junior staff get stretched too thin? Will the quality control that built these firms’ reputations suffer in the pursuit of scale?

Concern 3: The Homogenization Risk

One of the joys of the club and hospitality design world is its diversity. Different firms bring different aesthetic sensibilities. Different philosophical approaches. Different regional influences. This variety is healthy it means clubs can find designers whose vision aligns with their unique character and membership.

But consolidation tends toward standardization. When multiple firms operate under one corporate umbrella, there’s pressure for consistency in processes, deliverables, and yes, even design approaches. Will we start seeing more cookie-cutter solutions? Will the distinctive creative voices that made these firms special get diluted?

Concern 4: Talent Retention and Compensation

Here’s a uncomfortable truth: many talented architects join firms with the hope of eventually becoming partners. It’s the traditional career path work your way up, prove your value, eventually get an ownership stake and a meaningful share of profits.

In a PE-owned structure, that path becomes much more limited. There’s less equity to go around. The upside gets captured primarily by the PE investors. Will top design talent start avoiding PE-backed firms? Will the best young architects gravitate toward remaining independent practices?

Some PE-backed professional services firms have addressed this through creative equity and bonus structures. But it’s a real challenge, and in a people-intensive business like architecture, losing top talent can be devastating.

Concern 5: The Exit Imperative

Private equity investments have exits. Eventually, the PE firm needs to sell the company either to another PE firm, to a strategic buyer, or occasionally through an IPO. This creates uncertainty for clients.

Imagine you’re a club that’s developed a 15-year relationship with a particular architecture firm. You trust them. They understand your culture. You’ve worked together on multiple successful projects. Then private equity buys the firm. Then five years later, they sell it to another private equity firm with a different investment thesis.

At each transition point, things change. Leadership changes. Priorities shift. Suddenly, your trusted design partner feels less stable.

Concern 6: The Financialization of Design

Perhaps the deepest concern is philosophical. Great architecture comes from a place of passion, craft, and service to clients. It’s about solving problems elegantly, creating spaces that enhance human experience, honoring context and culture.

Private equity comes from a place of financial engineering, return optimization, and exit strategies. These aren’t inherently bad capitalism needs efficient capital allocation. But they’re fundamentally different value systems.

Can these two worldviews coexist productively? Or will the financial imperative gradually crowd out the design imperative?

We’re not entirely in uncharted territory here. Private equity has been rolling up other professional services sectors for years. We can learn from their experiences.

The accounting industry provides a particularly relevant case study. For decades, accounting firms operated as traditional partnerships. Then, starting in the 2010s and accelerating recently, private equity discovered the sector.

The results have been mixed. On the positive side, P E backed accounting firms have successfully invested in technology, expanded service offerings, and achieved scale that allows them to compete more effectively. Many have grown rapidly through acquisitions and have improved operational efficiency.

On the negative side, there have been culture clashes, partner retention issues, and concerns about whether the focus on financial metrics has compromised service quality. Some traditional accounting professionals lament the loss of the partnership ethos.

The consulting industry is another instructive example. Firms like Accenture successfully transitioned from partnership models to corporate structures and have thrived. But they maintained strong cultures focused on professional development and client service. The ones that treated consultants as interchangeable resources rather than valued professionals struggled with retention and reputation.

The lesson seems to be this: structure matters less than culture and leadership. PE-backed professional services firms can maintain quality and integrity but it requires deliberate effort, strong leadership, and investors who genuinely understand and value the professional services ethos.

So what does all this mean practically for club managers, boards, and others in the hospitality space who hire architects?

For Club Leaders:

First, do your homework. If you’re considering working with a PE-backed architecture firm, understand their ownership structure. Who makes the final decisions? How stable is the leadership? What’s the expected exit timeline? You’re entering into relationships that might span years—you want to ensure your design partner will be there for the long haul.

Second, insist on continuity. Put provisions in your contracts that specify which designers will actually work on your project. The firm’s reputation was built by specific talented individuals. Make sure those individuals will be dedicated to your project, not spread thin across a dozen others.

Third, consider the advantages. Don’t dismiss PE-backed firms automatically. They may offer capabilities—integrated services, advanced technology, geographic reach—that independent firms simply can’t match. Evaluate them on their merits.

For Architects:

If you’re considering selling to private equity or joining a PE-backed platform, be clear-eyed about the tradeoffs. You’ll likely get immediate liquidity and potentially powerful resources for growth. But you’ll also be giving up autonomy and probably a degree of creative control.

Talk to other architects who’ve made similar moves. Understand what changed and what didn’t. And negotiate thoughtfully—not just on price, but on governance, creative authority, and client relationship management.

For Design Talent:

This trend will reshape career paths in architecture. The traditional partnership track may become less available. But PE-backed firms may offer other advantages—better salaries, more structured career development, exposure to larger and more diverse projects.

Choose firms based on culture and leadership, not just ownership structure. A well-run PE-backed firm that values its people and maintains design excellence may be a better career choice than a dysfunctional independent partnership.

For the Industry:

The architecture profession should be having serious conversations about this trend. What regulations or professional standards might be needed to ensure PE involvement doesn’t compromise design quality or professional ethics? How can the industry preserve its best values—craftsmanship, client service, creative excellence—while embracing potentially beneficial capital and operational improvements?

So where does this all go?

Based on the broader private equity trends, we can make some educated predictions. First, consolidation will accelerate. We’ll likely see several large platforms emerge in the club and hospitality architecture space, each owning multiple firms. ClubWorks appears to be building one. There will probably be others.

Second, independent boutique firms will face pressure but won’t disappear. Some clients will always prefer the personal touch and creative freedom of independent architects. These firms may need to specialize more narrowly or compete on pure creative excellence, but there will be a market for them.

Third, we’ll see experimentation with hybrid models. Perhaps firms will be partially PE-backed while maintaining some partnership structure. Or maybe we’ll see profit-sharing arrangements that align incentives across both investor and design talent.

Fourth, technology will continue to be a differentiator. The firms that most successfully integrate AI, virtual reality, sustainability analysis, and data-driven design will have advantages regardless of their ownership structure.

And finally, quality will ultimately determine outcomes. If PE-backed architecture platforms maintain design excellence and client service, they’ll succeed and the model will prove viable. If financial pressures compromise quality, clients will notice and react accordingly.

The KDC-ClubWorks deal is an important test case. KDC has a stellar reputation. ClubWorks is building an impressive integrated platform. If they can maintain what made KDC special—creative excellence, client relationships, design innovation—while adding the advantages of scale and resources, they’ll validate the model.

If instead we see dilution of quality, loss of creative leaders, or clubs feeling like they’re getting generic solutions, it will raise serious questions about whether private equity and high-end architecture are truly compatible.

The private equity wave in architecture is here. It’s not a maybe or a someday—it’s happening right now, and it’s going to reshape the industry we all work in and care about.

Like any major change, it brings both opportunities and risks. Capital and scale and operational excellence on one side. Potential loss of culture and creative autonomy and client focus on the other.

The outcome isn’t predetermined. It will depend on the choices that PE investors make, the leadership that architects provide, and the standards that clients demand.

For those of us in the club and hospitality world, this isn’t just an interesting trend to observe from the sidelines. It directly affects the quality of spaces we’ll be designing, building, and operating for decades to come.

So stay informed. Ask questions. Hold your design partners—regardless of their ownership structure—to the highest standards. And help ensure that as the business model of architecture evolves, the core values of great design remain unchanged.

That’s all for today’s deep dive into the private equity revolution in architecture. I hope this gave you a lot to think about. If you found this valuable, please subscribe and share it with colleagues who care about the future of club and hospitality design.

Keep building spaces that bring people together and create unforgettable experiences.

Sources Referenced:

  • Golf Inc. Magazine – “Kuo Diedrich Chi Architects joins ClubWorks”
  • EY Private Equity Insights 2024-2025
  • Cherry Bekaert Private Equity Industry Reports 2024-2025
  • McKinsey Global Private Markets Report 2025
  • BDO Professional Services PE Trends Analysis
  • Cooper Parry Professional Services Insights
  • AlphaSense Private Equity Trends 2025

 

The Kids Question – Family Facilities Without Losing Adult Sophistication

Episode 109

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the complex challenge of integrating family facilities into private clubs while maintaining the sophisticated adult atmosphere that many members value. We examine design strategies that serve both constituencies excellently through thoughtful separation, quality amenities, and careful transition management.

Key Topics Covered:

  • Demographic realities and cultural shifts in club membership
  • Separate but equal dining solutions
  • Junior golf facilities and programming spaces
  • Pool complex design for multiple user groups
  • Managing acoustic and energy transitions
  • Economics of family amenity investment

Design Strategies Discussed:

  • Buffer zones and transition spaces
  • Acoustic management through materials and layout
  • Time-based space utilization
  • Circulation patterns that maintain separation
  • Visual and physical barriers that feel natural
  • Quality materials in family areas that maintain club standards

Family Dining Solutions:

  • “Family grill” concept vs. downgraded kids’ room
  • Durable but sophisticated materials
  • Acoustic treatments that control energy
  • Technology integration for service efficiency
  • Indoor-outdoor opportunities
  • Time-based transitions to adult service

Junior Golf Best Practices:

  • Separate but valued practice facilities
  • Age-appropriate design and challenges
  • Technology integration for engagement
  • Parent accommodation spaces
  • Progressive access to adult facilities
  • Competition and tournament support

Pool Complex Strategies:

  • Multiple bodies of water for different uses
  • Physical or visual separation techniques
  • Age-appropriate features without compromising quality
  • Acoustic management around water
  • Support facilities for different user groups
  • Programming spaces for activities

Economic Considerations:

  • Lifetime value of multigenerational memberships
  • Programming revenue opportunities: $200K+ annually possible
  • Recruitment and retention benefits
  • Sponsorship and fundraising opportunities
  • Operational efficiencies through good design
  • Premium dues for premium family experiences

Key Principles:

  1. Separation creates harmony – both groups need quality spaces
  2. Commit fully or not at all – half-measures satisfy no one
  3. Design enables operational efficiency
  4. Quality in family areas demonstrates value
  5. Transitions are as important as destinations
  6. Economic returns require premium execution

Critical Success Factors:

  • Clear club positioning on family services
  • Investment in quality family amenities
  • Thoughtful separation and transition strategies
  • Consistent operational standards
  • Communication with all member groups
  • Long-term demographic planning

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

The Breakfast Rush to Dinner Service – Designing for 18 Hours of Operation

Episode 108

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the complex challenge of designing clubhouses that operate efficiently and beautifully from early morning through late evening. We examine how flexible design, smart systems, and thoughtful planning can create spaces that transform throughout the day while maximizing both member satisfaction and revenue generation.

Key Topics Covered:

  • Understanding daily rhythm and usage patterns
  • Kitchen design for multiple service styles
  • Flexible furniture systems and transformable spaces
  • Lighting design for daypart transitions
  • Managing the lunch rush efficiently
  • Revenue optimization strategies throughout the day

Design Strategies Discussed:

  • Zone-based kitchen layouts for different meal periods
  • Modular furniture systems that maintain quality
  • Multi-scene lighting control systems
  • Circulation planning for peak efficiency
  • Acoustic management during high-volume periods
  • Technology integration for operational efficiency

Operational Insights:

  • Morning: 5:30 AM early golfers to business breakfast crowd
  • Mid-morning: Work-from-club and coffee house opportunities
  • Lunch: Managing 60-70% of daily covers in 90 minutes
  • Afternoon: Social gatherings and alternative programming
  • Evening: Transformation to sophisticated dining
  • Late night: Bar revenue and private events

Revenue Opportunities by Daypart:

  • Breakfast: $15-20 per cover x frequency = significant revenue
  • Coffee/snacks: High-margin offerings with minimal labor
  • Lunch: Volume leadership with optimization potential
  • Afternoon: Wine tastings, tea service, happy hour
  • Dinner: Differentiation through experience
  • Late evening: Nightcap service and private events

Key Design Principles:

  1. Flexibility without compromising quality
  2. Technology that enables smooth transitions
  3. Distinct daypart experiences with cohesive identity
  4. Operational efficiency through thoughtful planning
  5. Revenue generation throughout all operating hours

Investment Considerations:

  • Flexible furniture systems: Higher initial cost, long-term savings
  • Lighting controls: Significant impact on ambiance and energy
  • Kitchen equipment: Multi-purpose tools for various service styles
  • Technology systems: POS, ordering, and management integration

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

 

The Welcome Sequence – Mastering First Impressions from Parking to Pro Shop

Episode 107

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the critical arrival experience at golf clubs, from the entry gate to the clubhouse threshold. We examine how thoughtful design of approach drives, arrival courts, bag drops, and entry sequences can create memorable first impressions while solving operational challenges and providing intuitive wayfinding.

Key Topics Covered:

  • Psychology of arrival and transition experiences
  • Entry gate and approach drive design strategies
  • Arrival court and parking dynamics
  • Valet vs. self-park considerations
  • Bag drop operations and design
  • Threshold moments and entrance design
  • Intuitive wayfinding without signage overload

Design Principles Discussed:

  • Progressive disclosure and sequential revelation
  • Decompression zones and transition spaces
  • Soft security approaches
  • Material and lighting strategies for wayfinding
  • Balancing efficiency with elegance
  • Creating flexibility for different arrival modes

Operational Considerations:

  • Peak time traffic management
  • Valet and bag drop logistics
  • Weather protection strategies
  • Technology integration (RFID, apps, automation)
  • Storage and staging solutions
  • Multiple user type accommodation

Key Takeaways:

  1. First impressions begin at the property entrance, not the clubhouse door
  2. The arrival sequence should tell a story and build anticipation
  3. Great wayfinding relies on architecture, not signs
  4. Flexibility is crucial for different times and event types
  5. Every element should reinforce club identity and values
  6. The best designs feel effortless despite careful orchestration

Design Strategies:

  • Use approach drives to create mental transition
  • Design arrival courts as architectural theater
  • Integrate bag drops seamlessly into the arrival flow
  • Create intuitive paths through materials and lighting
  • Balance operational efficiency with member experience

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

The Locker Room Revolution – From Storage Space to Social Hub

Episode 106

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the transformation of golf club locker rooms from purely functional spaces into luxury social hubs and wellness destinations. We examine how modern clubs are reimagining these traditional spaces to meet contemporary member expectations while respecting heritage and fostering community.

Key Topics Covered:

  • Evolution from traditional wood lockers to luxury personal storage systems
  • Integration of spa and wellness amenities
  • Technology transformation in access, charging, and personalization
  • Creation of social spaces and productivity areas
  • Managing generational differences in expectations
  • Business case for locker room investment
  • Future trends in locker room design

Key Design Trends Discussed:

  • Locker suites and neighborhoods
  • Spa amenities: saunas, steam, cold plunge, recovery lounges
  • Biometric access and RFID integration
  • Locker room bars and dining options
  • Business centers and meeting spaces
  • Family-friendly areas
  • Premium materials and finishes

Financial Insights:

  • Premium lockers: $5,000-$15,000 annual fees
  • Renovation costs: $2-5 million for complete transformation
  • ROI: 5-7 year payback periods typical
  • Revenue streams: locker fees, spa services, F&B, amenity charges

Design Strategies:

  • Balance tradition with innovation
  • Create flexible, multi-use spaces
  • Integrate technology invisibly
  • Provide graduated experiences for different comfort levels
  • Focus on revenue generation alongside member satisfaction

Future Trends:

  • Deeper wellness integration
  • Sustainability focus
  • AI-powered personalization
  • Boutique hotel influences
  • Flexible membership accommodations

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

Going Dry – Desert Golf Architecture and Water Innovation

Episode 104

Welcome back to Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design, the podcast exploring the intricacies of golf clubhouse design, human interaction, and its impact on member lifestyles. I’m your host, and today we’re venturing beyond the clubhouse walls to explore a fascinating challenge that affects everything we design – creating golf experiences in desert environments while being responsible stewards of our most precious resource: water.

If you’re new to the show, we dive deep into architecture and interior design concepts that lead to successful golf clubhouses and resorts. While we typically focus on pro shops, fitness facilities, and dining experiences, today’s topic directly impacts how we think about the entire golf facility ecosystem. You can find all our episodes at golfclubhousedesign.com and connect with us on LinkedIn.

Today’s episode, “Going Dry: Desert Golf Architecture and Water Innovation,” examines how golf course architects are creating stunning, playable courses in some of the world’s most challenging environments. We’ll explore the evolution from the first desert course in 1920s Palm Springs to today’s sophisticated water management systems, and discuss what this means for clubhouse design in these unique settings.

Why does this matter for clubhouse designers? Because the golf course and clubhouse are inseparable partners. The landscape shapes the architecture, the climate drives our material choices, and the water management strategies influence everything from landscaping to operational planning. When you’re designing in the desert, you’re not just creating a building – you’re creating an oasis that must harmonize with its arid surroundings while providing the comfort and luxury members expect.


Let’s start with a remarkable story of vision and innovation. Picture Palm Springs in the early 1920s. Thomas O’Donnell, a California oil pioneer, is recovering from a respiratory illness at the Desert Inn. To pass the time, he’s out there pitching golf balls around the property. At that time, the idea of laying out a golf course in the desert was, frankly, absurd. But O’Donnell, along with fellow oilman Captain John Lucey, saw possibility where others saw impossibility.

They formalized nine holes alongside the Desert Inn at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains, creating what’s widely considered the first golf course in a desert environment – the O’Donnell Golf Club, built in 1927. Think about the audacity of that moment. No precedent, no playbook, just pure pioneering spirit.

What’s fascinating about their approach is how thoughtful it was, even then. The course was routed among existing rows of tamarisk trees, supplemented with drought-tolerant plantings that served double duty as shade and windbreaks. They introduced Bermuda turf overseeded with rye or fescue during winter – a maintenance practice that’s still common across the Southwest today.

This set the stage for what would become a revolution in golf course design. From the 1930s through the 1970s, architects like William P. “Billy” Bell and his son William F. Bell, Lawrence Hughes, Robert “Red” Lawrence, and Jack Snyder would carry this desert golf concept forward.

Red Lawrence’s Desert Forest course in Carefree, Arizona, laid out in 1962, was particularly pioneering. It was integrated within the desert landscape in a way that inspired others to embrace their surroundings rather than impose their courses upon them. As ASGCA Past President Forrest Richardson notes in the article, “While Red Lawrence and Billy Bell had worked with the land, Snyder took an even lighter approach.”

Jack Snyder’s work at The Boulders in the 1970s ushered in what Richardson calls “a new era of desert golf design.” His minimalist approach left rock outcroppings and native desert untouched as much as possible. This wasn’t just about aesthetics – it was about understanding that in the desert, you don’t conquer the landscape; you collaborate with it.

For us as clubhouse designers, this evolution is crucial to understand. These pioneering courses established design principles that influence how we approach desert projects today. The clubhouse isn’t separate from this philosophy – it needs to embody the same respect for the landscape, the same innovative approach to resource management, and the same harmony with the natural environment.


Water has always been the defining challenge of desert golf, and as Forrest Richardson beautifully puts it, desert courses demand a different mindset about water. Richardson’s own journey is charming – his very first design was a miniature course called “Rolling Rocks” in his Phoenix backyard, where he raked the desert floor and installed tuna cans as cups. From that childhood experiment to his professional work on courses like Arizona Grand, his takeaway is profound: “We need to balance factors such as water availability, delivery and storage – and future climate change.”

Here’s what’s really interesting and often misunderstood about water use in desert golf. Richardson makes a crucial distinction: “Many people assume golf ‘uses’ water. But the reality is that water in the desert is more about ‘borrowing’ – the science today is returning water to the land, often by recharging the groundwater.”

Think about that for a moment. Today’s desert courses primarily rely on recycled water rather than groundwater. Turf acts as a natural filter, processing millions of gallons of treated wastewater daily before it returns to the aquifer. This is a sustainable model that turns golf courses into part of the water treatment infrastructure.

There’s another benefit that directly impacts our clubhouse designs – courses cool their surroundings. In Phoenix, neighborhoods near golf courses are three to five degrees cooler than adjacent urban heat islands. When we’re designing clubhouses in these environments, we’re not just creating buildings next to grass; we’re working within engineered microclimates.

The numbers tell an important story about evolving design strategies. Richardson notes that an 18-hole regulation course might have about 60 acres of turf. But designers are getting creative – adding more par threes, which require far less grass than par fours or fives. Some courses are achieving the same playability with significantly less irrigated area.

Cynthia Dye McGarey’s experience at Ancala Country Club in Scottsdale illustrates just how dramatic these restrictions can be. In 1990, she faced a turf limitation of just 78 acres. Her solution? Only the tees are irrigated, and the landing areas are kept to 50 yards wide with borders kept pretty bare of vegetation. The irrigation system uses hardline with half heads to minimize overspray into native areas.

This has profound implications for clubhouse design. When the golf course is using sophisticated water management, the clubhouse needs to follow suit. We’re talking about drought-tolerant landscaping, water recapture systems, and architectural designs that minimize irrigation needs while still creating that oasis feeling members expect.

Richardson predicts more short and alternative formats in the desert going forward. “It just makes sense,” he says. “Less turf, less water and – often – more fun.” For clubhouse designers, this means thinking about facilities that can support different golf formats – perhaps smaller locker rooms but more social spaces, different storage needs, and food and beverage operations that cater to shorter rounds and more casual play.


One of the most enlightening aspects of this article is how it reveals the diversity of desert environments. As Cynthia Dye McGarey explains, desert landscapes vary dramatically – the native area can be sand, rock, lush desert scrub, or completely bare. Each type demands a different design approach.

Let’s start with the Sonoran Desert, where McGarey has done extensive work. She describes it as rocky and undulating, with a web of arroyos cutting across the land. In this lush desert setting, earthworks are minimal. The design philosophy is to lay out the golf course to highlight natural features, preserve vegetation, and strategically use the natural terrain. This is design by subtraction – taking away as little as possible rather than adding.

Now contrast that with her work in the Mojave Desert at Las Vegas Paiute Golf Resort. As she notes, “The Mojave Desert is completely different to the Sonoran. The terrain is much flatter, and the vegetation is very sparse.” Here, everything in the golfing corridor had to be graded. Without natural topography to tie into, they kept minor arroyos as features and capped the turf area with six inches of sand. Sandy waste areas and strip bunkers help keep the ball in play.

Interestingly, the Paiute courses didn’t have water restrictions – they’re located on a large aquifer with crystal clear water. Even so, the turf area was limited to 96 acres, maintaining the desert golf character despite having access to water.

Then there’s the red rock desert of Utah. John Fought and Andy Staples’ Sand Hollow course near St. George, opened in 2008, was built on red sand and takes full advantage of the site’s dunes, ridgelines, and rock formations. The underlying dunes provide natural drainage, allowing for precise irrigation without runoff or pooling.

For clubhouse designers, understanding these regional differences is crucial. A clubhouse in the Sonoran Desert might embrace organic forms that echo the undulating terrain and incorporate natural rock outcroppings. In the Mojave, with its flatter terrain, the architecture might be more sculptural, creating its own topography. In Utah’s red rock country, the color palette and material choices need to harmonize with those dramatic sandstone formations.

Each desert type also brings different challenges. The Sonoran’s rocky terrain might require elevated structures and creative foundation solutions. The Mojave’s sparse vegetation means less natural shade, requiring more architectural solutions for sun protection. Utah’s red sand can create unique maintenance challenges that need to be considered in material selection and detailing.

Rees Jones and Steve Weisser’s work at TPC Danzante Bay in Mexico adds another dimension – a combination of canyon, desert, beach, and mountain environments all in one course. As Weisser explains, they shaped holes to create grades receptive to shots on the high sides and turfgrass swales to collect shots that roll off the low sides. They incorporated playable desert areas adjacent to the turf to transition into the preserved native desert.

This diversity in desert types means we can’t have a one-size-fits-all approach to clubhouse design in arid environments. Each project needs to respond to its specific desert context, both aesthetically and functionally.


One of the most compelling aspects of modern desert golf design is the delicate balance between creating a playable, enjoyable golf experience and being responsible stewards of water resources. John Fought puts it perfectly: “While not every state has the turf restrictions that must be followed in Arizona, it is important to be good stewards of water usage.”

Fought’s design philosophy offers valuable lessons that extend beyond the golf course to our clubhouse designs. He emphasizes having plenty of room to hit a drive – often with landing zones 70 yards wide – but then narrowing areas around back tees and near greens to eliminate unnecessary turf. This strategic approach to turf placement is about understanding how the game is actually played and designing accordingly.

At Sand Hollow, Fought’s team angled tees so only the bigger hitters had forced carries. They kept the fronts of greens generally open so weaker players could bounce their approaches onto the putting surface. As he notes, “We need to create holes that players play without losing golf balls. As long as there is an option to play a hole without undue risk, then I think we have done our job as designers.”

This philosophy of accommodation without compromise should inform our clubhouse designs too. How do we create spaces that welcome golfers of all abilities? How do our facilities support both the scratch player and the beginner? The answer often lies in flexibility and thoughtful planning.

Steve Weisser’s insights from TPC Danzante Bay add another layer to this discussion. He talks about incorporating desert hazards on angles into the line of play in ways that become increasingly easier to navigate as the tees move forward. Every green has turfgrass chipping areas to facilitate achievable recovery shots. It’s about locating turf in areas that see the highest amounts of play.

The technology component is fascinating. Hunter Industries’ Carl Eberts explains how modern irrigation technology helps minimize water usage. At Ak-Chin Southern Dunes Golf Club south of Phoenix, they’ve installed Hunter’s TTS-800 Series Golf Rotors with PressurePort technology. These systems optimize nozzle pressure to produce ideal droplet size, ensuring maximum distribution uniformity even in 120-degree Fahrenheit heat and strong desert winds.

For clubhouse designers, this technological sophistication extends to our buildings. We should be thinking about smart building systems that can respond to extreme temperature swings, innovative cooling strategies that don’t rely solely on energy-intensive air conditioning, and materials that can withstand intense UV exposure while maintaining their appearance.

The collaboration between irrigation experts and golf course architects that Eberts describes should inspire similar collaboration in clubhouse design. We need to work closely with mechanical engineers, landscape architects, and sustainability consultants to create buildings that are as water-efficient as the courses they serve.

Richardson’s observation about runoff is particularly important: “We’ve learned that excess water escaping to the native desert can alter vegetation in unnatural ways.” This applies to our clubhouse sites too. Every drop of water that falls on our roofs, runs off our parking lots, or drains from our facilities needs to be carefully managed to avoid disrupting the delicate desert ecosystem.


Now let’s bring this home to what it all means for clubhouse design in desert environments. The evolution of desert golf from O’Donnell’s pioneering course to today’s sophisticated layouts has profound implications for how we approach clubhouse architecture.

First, there’s the philosophical alignment. Just as modern desert golf courses embrace rather than impose upon the landscape, our clubhouses need to reflect this same sensitivity. This isn’t about creating a generic country club that happens to be in the desert – it’s about creating architecture that could only exist in this specific place.

Material selection becomes critical. We need materials that can handle extreme temperature swings – sometimes 40 degrees or more between day and night. We need finishes that won’t fade under intense UV radiation. We need building assemblies that can handle blowing sand and occasional flash floods. But beyond durability, our materials need to connect to the landscape – the warm tones of desert sand, the textures of native rock, the colors that shift with the changing light.

The indoor-outdoor relationship takes on special significance in desert clubhouses. Members want to experience the dramatic landscape, but they also need refuge from the heat. This calls for sophisticated transitional spaces – deep overhangs that provide shade, covered terraces with misting systems, and outdoor rooms that can be comfortable even in extreme temperatures.

Water features, ironically, become even more important in desert clubhouses. Not vast lakes or fountains that evaporate precious water, but thoughtful, efficient water elements that provide psychological cooling and create microclimates. Think of narrow rills that can be turned off during water restrictions, or recirculating features that minimize water loss.

The programming of desert clubhouses often differs from traditional facilities. With play concentrated in cooler morning and evening hours, we need spaces that can accommodate different patterns of use. Perhaps the main dining room needs to open earlier for pre-dawn breakfast. Maybe we need more extensive cart storage facilities with charging stations, since walking 18 holes in 110-degree heat isn’t realistic.

Climate control strategies go beyond just powerful air conditioning. We’re talking about building orientation that minimizes solar gain, thermal mass that moderates temperature swings, and innovative cooling strategies like earth tubes or solar chimneys. The goal is comfort with minimal energy use – just as the golf course seeks playability with minimal water use.

The social spaces in desert clubhouses often become more important than in other climates. When it’s too hot to play during midday in summer, members need engaging alternatives. This might mean larger fitness facilities, more extensive indoor amenities, or flexible spaces that can host programs and events during the heat of the day.

We also need to think about maintenance and operations. Desert dust is incredibly fine and gets into everything. Our HVAC systems need superior filtration. Our finishes need to be easy to clean. Our entries need airlocks or vestibules to minimize dust infiltration. These aren’t sexy design features, but they’re essential for long-term success.


As we look to the future, several trends are emerging that will shape both desert golf courses and the clubhouses that serve them.

Richardson’s prediction about more short and alternative formats in the desert makes perfect sense. We’re already seeing this with par-3 courses, short courses, and putting courses that use a fraction of the water of traditional layouts. For clubhouse designers, this means rethinking our facilities. Maybe we need smaller locker rooms but larger social spaces. Perhaps the pro shop becomes more about lifestyle retail than golf equipment. The food and beverage program might shift toward more casual, all-day dining rather than formal dinner service.

The international expansion of desert golf is particularly interesting. As the article notes, it’s not just the Southwestern US and Mexico anymore. Population centers in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia are demanding golf, and they’re in even more extreme desert environments. The design techniques that evolved in Palm Springs are being refined and adapted for places where water is even scarcer and temperatures even more extreme.

This global expansion of desert golf presents opportunities for clubhouse designers to push boundaries. How do we incorporate regional architectural traditions while meeting international golf standards? How do we create clubhouses that respect local culture while serving a potentially diverse, international membership? These are complex challenges that require sensitivity and innovation.

Climate change adds another layer of complexity. As Richardson notes, we need to balance current needs with future climate projections. Droughts may become more severe. Temperatures may rise. Water restrictions may tighten. Our clubhouse designs need to be resilient and adaptable. This might mean designing for future solar panel installation, planning for greywater systems that aren’t yet required, or creating spaces that can be naturally ventilated if energy costs spike.

The technology component will only grow in importance. Just as irrigation systems have become incredibly sophisticated, our clubhouses will incorporate more smart building technologies. Imagine windows that automatically tint based on sun angle, or HVAC systems that predict and prepare for the daily influx of golfers, or water recycling systems that capture and treat every drop used in the building.

There’s also a growing recognition that desert golf courses and clubhouses can be part of larger sustainability stories. They can be demonstration projects for water conservation, renewable energy, and sustainable building practices. They can educate members and visitors about desert ecology and conservation. They can be leaders in their communities rather than targets for criticism about resource use.

The most successful desert golf facilities of the future will be those that fully integrate course and clubhouse design, that see water and energy conservation not as constraints but as design drivers, and that create experiences that are uniquely of their place. They’ll be facilities that members can feel proud of – not just for their beauty or challenge, but for their environmental stewardship.


As we conclude today’s exploration of desert golf architecture and water innovation, I’m struck by how much the story of desert golf is really a story of human ingenuity and adaptation. From Thomas O’Donnell pitching golf balls around the Desert Inn to today’s sophisticated courses that process wastewater while providing world-class playing conditions, we’ve seen remarkable evolution.

For those of us involved in clubhouse design, the lessons are clear. First, respect the landscape. The desert isn’t a blank canvas to be painted over – it’s a partner in the design process. Second, embrace constraints as catalysts for creativity. Water scarcity isn’t a problem to be solved but a reality to be designed around. Third, think systemically. The clubhouse, the golf course, and the surrounding environment are all part of one integrated ecosystem.

The pioneering spirit that created that first desert course in Palm Springs is still needed today. We need designers willing to challenge conventional thinking, to question whether we really need all that turf, all that conditioned space, all those traditional amenities. We need clients willing to invest in innovation, to be patient with experimentation, and to value sustainability alongside luxury.

Most importantly, we need to remember that golf in the desert is a privilege, not a right. Every course, every clubhouse, exists through careful management of scarce resources. Our responsibility as designers is to create facilities that honor this reality while still delivering the joy, community, and challenge that make golf special.

The future of desert golf and clubhouse design is bright, but it requires continued innovation, collaboration, and respect for the unique environments we’re privileged to work in. Whether it’s the Sonoran, the Mojave, or deserts yet to host their first golf course, the principles remain the same: work with the land, conserve resources, and create experiences that could exist nowhere else.

Thank you for joining me for this deep dive into desert golf architecture and its implications for clubhouse design. You can find additional resources and links to the projects discussed at golfclubhousedesign.com. If you’re working on a desert project or have experiences to share about designing in arid environments, we’d love to hear from you. Connect with us on LinkedIn and share your stories.

Until next time, remember that great design isn’t about imposing our will on the landscape – it’s about finding harmony between human desires and natural systems. This has been Experience in Golf Clubhouse Design. Stay inspired, stay innovative, and keep designing spaces that respect both the game we love and the land that hosts it.

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the evolution of desert golf course architecture from the 1920s to today, examining how designers create playable, enjoyable courses while minimizing water use. We discuss the implications for clubhouse design in arid environments and the innovative strategies being employed to balance luxury with sustainability.

Key Topics Covered:

  • The pioneering history of desert golf from O’Donnell Golf Club (1927)
  • Water management strategies and the “borrowing” vs “using” concept
  • Regional desert variations (Sonoran, Mojave, Utah red rock)
  • Balancing playability with sustainability
  • Technology innovations in irrigation
  • Clubhouse design strategies for desert environments
  • Future trends in desert golf and climate adaptation

Featured Experts and Courses Mentioned:

  • Forrest Richardson, ASGCA Past President
  • Cynthia Dye McGarey, ASGCA
  • John Fought, ASGCA
  • Andy Staples, ASGCA
  • Rees Jones, ASGCA Past President
  • Steve Weisser, ASGCA
  • Carl Eberts, Hunter Industries

Notable Courses Discussed:

  • O’Donnell Golf Club, Palm Springs (1927)
  • Desert Forest, Carefree, Arizona (1962)
  • The Boulders, Carefree, Arizona (1970s)
  • Ancala Country Club, Scottsdale, Arizona
  • Sand Hollow, St. George, Utah (2008)
  • TPC Danzante Bay, Mexico
  • Las Vegas Paiute Golf Resort
  • Ak-Chin Southern Dunes Golf Club, Phoenix

Key Statistics:

  • Modern courses use 60-96 acres of irrigated turf (vs 150+ traditionally)
  • Golf neighborhoods in Phoenix are 3-5 degrees cooler than surrounding areas
  • Desert courses can process millions of gallons of treated wastewater daily
  • Water restrictions can limit courses to as little as 78 acres of turf

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

Source Article: “Going Dry: Desert Golf” by Richard Humphreys, featuring insights from ASGCA members

 

From Stuffy to Social – Designing F&B Spaces for the Instagram Generation

Episode 103

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: This episode explores the delicate balance of transforming traditional club F&B spaces for modern members while respecting heritage and tradition. We examine how social media, changing demographics, and evolving dining preferences are reshaping clubhouse design, with practical strategies for creating spaces that serve both traditional members and the Instagram generation.

Key Topics Covered:

  • The shift from formal dining to social, experiential F&B
  • Designing spaces that photograph well without sacrificing sophistication
  • The multi-venue strategy for diverse member needs
  • Managing cultural resistance to change
  • Practical design solutions for acoustic, lighting, and flexibility challenges
  • Case studies of successful F&B transformations

Key Takeaways:

  1. F&B now represents 35-40% of club revenues (up from 20% two decades ago)
  2. Natural light and thoughtful material selection are crucial for both experience and photography
  3. Multiple dining venues serve different demographics and occasions better than one-size-fits-all
  4. Gradual evolution and member involvement reduce resistance to change
  5. Flexibility in design allows spaces to evolve with trends
  6. Technology should enhance, not dominate, the dining experience

Design Strategies Discussed:

  • Acoustic management in open-concept spaces
  • Flexible furniture systems for multi-use spaces
  • Display kitchens vs. open kitchens
  • Indoor-outdoor integration
  • Lighting scenes for different times and moods
  • Heritage preservation within modern updates

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes

 

When Wall Street Meets the 19th Hole: How Investment Trends are Reshaping Clubhouse Design

Episode 102

SHOW NOTES

Episode Summary: In this episode, we explore the 2025 golf investment landscape and its profound implications for clubhouse design. Drawing from Golf Inc. Magazine’s comprehensive market analysis, we examine how record participation, changing demographics, and new ownership structures are reshaping what modern clubhouses need to deliver.

Key Topics Covered:

  • Current golf market metrics and investment trends
  • The “amenities arms race” in private clubs
  • Premium clubs changing ownership
  • Design implications for diversification and flexibility
  • Technology integration in modern clubhouses
  • Balancing tradition with innovation

Resources Mentioned:

Featured Experts Cited:

  • Jeff Woolson & Brandon Schempp (CBRE)
  • Christopher Karamitsos (Leisure Investment Properties Group)
  • Jimmy Han (Century Golf Partners)
  • Jordan Peace (Concert Golf Partners)

Connect With Us:

  • Website: golfclubhousedesign.com
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/
  • Listen on Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR

Episode Length: Approximately 30 minutes