Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Episode: The Case for Letting Members Smoke Inside Again — What Clubs Have Optimized Away in the Name of Modernization
Over the past thirty years, private clubs across the country have systematically removed the sensory, social, and architectural textures that once defined club life — not because the law required it, but because boards, committees, and design consultants chose to. The cigar lounge is the most visible casualty, but it is only a lens. Behind it sits a much larger pattern of erasure: dark paneling painted over, leather chairs sold off, pipe racks taken down, grill rooms brightened into generic dining spaces, and a generation of clubhouses that photograph beautifully and feel quietly less distinctive to the members who have been walking into them for decades. This episode does not argue for bringing back indoor smoking. It argues that most clubs conflated the policy change with a character change — and that the character change was never required.
Topics discussed: what the traditional cigar lounge actually was as an architectural and social form (leather furniture, acoustic absorption, specific pace of service, ritualized post-round time); why removing the smoke did not require removing everything else the room was doing; the pipe racks, card rooms, members’ bars, reading rooms, formal dining rooms, and men’s grill rooms that were erased as collateral damage of modernization; the legitimate critique of exclusionary club spaces and why the pendulum swung further than it needed to (the additive versus subtractive architectural task); the caddy yard as a case study in operational efficiency versus institutional visibility; the locker room as a social space that has been converted into a changing area; the specific aesthetic vocabulary of pre-1995 American clubhouses (walnut, leather, patterned carpet, brass, oil paintings, enclosed rooms) and how it was replaced by a hospitality-trend vocabulary indistinguishable from boutique hotels; who is responsible for the pattern (architects who do not push back, renovation consultants with house styles, boards that present choices as necessities, committees uncomfortable with tradition, members who stay silent, and newer members whose preferences are projected rather than asked); the generational divide between members who experience modernization as loss and members who never knew what was lost; the texture audit as a pre-renovation discipline for identifying irreplaceable institutional character; the outdoor cigar terrace as a legitimate architectural solution when designed with real investment (proper stone, furniture, lighting, overhead protection, perimeter ventilation, service adjacency) versus treated as an afterthought; the formal dining room that was underutilized eight nights a year and irreplaceable on all eight; brass plaques, portrait walls, trophy cases, ship models, and entry tile patterns as physical evidence of institutional continuity; and what the next generation of club renovations should preserve deliberately alongside whatever modernization the club pursues.
The takeaway: the title is a provocation, not a policy argument. The real question is whether every replacement in your clubhouse since you first joined was actually necessary — and whether the next renovation should preserve more and modernize less. The texture audit, a deliberate pre-renovation inventory of irreplaceable institutional character, is one of the highest-leverage and most consistently skipped design disciplines in the industry. The clubs that execute it seriously produce buildings members love for generations. The ones that skip it produce buildings that photograph well for a season and then feel generic.
Connect with us: LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/egcd/ | Fountain: fountain.fm/show/yzI5IQdvhrChoCRj3htR